7 Annotations

April Peavey  •  Link

Was lobster an expensive delicacy or was it regarded as a "poor man's meal?"

James Griffin  •  Link

I have read that one reason the Pilgrims in Massachusetts were so short of food during their first year in America is that they did not consider lobsters edible.

dirk  •  Link

Lobsters vs Pilgrims

Not very credible, if you check this site:
"The English colonists ate a variety of shellfish, including lobster, but they preferred their traditional, grain-based fare. Shellfish might have been an especially important staple of the colonist's diet before the English grain-based foods were plentiful."
http://www.es.umb.edu/faculty/edg/files/bhms/bh2m…
The main problem seems to have been not so much one of taste but preservation in a time when there were no cooling facilities...

At some point even:
"Lobster was a poor man's food."
http://www.fostertravel.com/CNBRUN.html

Bill  •  Link

If you are ordered to break the claw of a crab or a lobster, clap it between the sides of the dining-room door between the hinges. Thus you can do it gradually without mashing the meat; which is often the fate of the street-door key, or the pestle.
---Directions to Servants. Jonathan Swift, 1745.

San Diego Sarah  •  Link

Poor food? Pepys enjoyed lobster every year in the Diary.

William Clifford  •  Link

While today it’s considered a delicacy, lobster was once a poor man’s food. Thanks to its overabundance, people quickly became sick of the shellfish and only fed it to animals, prisoners, and indentured servants. However, lobster became a popular luxury food in the late 1800s and remains one to this day.

Log in to post an annotation.

If you don't have an account, then register here.

References

Chart showing the number of references in each month of the diary’s entries.

1660

  • May
  • Jul
  • Aug
  • Sep

1661

1662

1663

1664

1665

1666

1667

1668