Saturday 22 February 1667/68

Up, and by coach through Ducke Lane, and there did buy Kircher’s Musurgia, cost me 35s., a book I am mighty glad of, expecting to find great satisfaction in it. Thence to Westminster Hall and the lobby, and up and down there all the morning, and to the Lords’ House, and heard the Solicitor-General plead very finely, as he always do; and this was in defence of the East India Company against a man that complains of wrong from them, and thus up and down till noon in expectation of our business coming on in the House of Commons about tickets, but they being busy about my Lord Gerard’s business I did give over the thoughts of ours coming on, and so with my wife, and Mercer, and Deb., who come to the Hall to me, I away to the Beare, in Drury Lane, and there bespoke a dish of meat; and, in the mean time, sat and sung with Mercer; and, by and by, dined with mighty pleasure, and excellent meat, one little dish enough for us all, and good wine, and all for 8s., and thence to the Duke’s playhouse, and there saw “Albumazar,” an old play, this the second time of acting. It is said to have been the ground of B. Jonson’s “Alchymist;” but, saving the ridicuiousnesse of Angell’s part, which is called Trinkilo, I do not see any thing extraordinary in it, but was indeed weary of it before it was done. The King here, and, indeed, all of us, pretty merry at the mimique tricks of Trinkilo. So home, calling in Ducke Lane for the book I bought this morning, and so home, and wrote my letters at the office, and then home to supper and to bed.

13 Annotations

Terry Foreman   Link to this

Ossory to Ormond
Written from: [London]
Date: 22 February 1668

Intends to prosecute his journey into Ireland, with all speed. Hears that "My Lord of Meath" [apparently, Edward Brabazon, second Earl of Meath] has come to town with many complaints, in order to the presenting of which to the King, he made some endeavour to obtain the countenance of the Duke of Buckingham, who, it is said, caused him to be informed that he, Buckingham, was related to the Duke of Ormond, "and would not contribute" to Ormond's disturbance.

http://www.rsl.ox.ac.uk/dept/scwmss/projects/ca...

Terry Foreman   Link to this

“the House of Commons…busy about my Lord Gerard’s business”

http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?co...

Carl in Boston   Link to this

excellent meat, one little dish enough for us all, and good wine, and all for 8s
I have heard a shilling was a day's wages, or was in the time of Bertie Wooster. This meal would have cost 8 days' wages, and thought inexpensive.

Terry Foreman   Link to this

Carl in Boston, you make a very good point. Moreover, there is the matter of "the King's shilling" in which Pepys is implicated as an Officer of the Navy Office. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King's_shilling

Mary   Link to this

and there did buy Kircher’s Musurgia

Oh dear, Sam has recently spent hours 'titling' all his books, shelving them and indexing them - all nice and neat and orderly - and straight away goes and buys another book! He hasn't mentioned disposing of any of his earlier purchases (except for L'Escholle des Filles, which presumably never made it as far as the book-case) and he's already determined that his book-cases are now full, so where is this one going to go? Cue the carpenter?

djc   Link to this

2s a head for an excellent meal, 35s for a book!

JWB   Link to this

"When John Dryden wrote the Prologue for the 1668 revivial of Albumazar, he got the relationship between the Tomkis and Jonson plays backwards, and accused Jonson of borrowing from Tomkis."[4] Wikipedia

And so did Pepys.

Terry Foreman   Link to this

"“Albumazar,” an old play, this the second time of acting. It is said to have been the ground of B. Jonson’s “Alchymist;”"

L&M note this mistaken assumption derived from Dryden's preface for the 1668 revival of “Albumazar,” first performed five years after the 1610 premier of the “Alchymist”: Dryden got it backwards.

cgs   Link to this

maids wage 3quid per annum or 3 bob Per day, twose what Samuel paid a maid for 24/7 for tossing the poe out and for delousing.

mick d   Link to this

There could be misunderstanding of quids and bobs here on either side, but I take 3 quid to be 60 shillings (or bobs) So surely just over one bob per week, not 3 bob per day?

cum salis grano   Link to this

Quid [slang] is 20 bob [slang] shillings or one old pound.

A good source for costs for !660 and a good read too, is the well informed Liza Picard "Restoration London"
Samuel paid his first maid 2L and all that you could eat.

GrahamT   Link to this

A little off-topic linguistic pedantry here: "bob" is used for singular and plural, "bobs" is never heard, so; a bob (a shilling) , two-bob (two shillings = one florin), five-bob (five shillings = one crown)
e.g.
Scouts' fund raising - Bob-a-Job,
Ten-bob note - old currency note worth half a sov/quid/pound, replaced by the 50 pence piece at decimalisation.
Quid is a pound = 20 bob = 240 old pence = 100 new pence. Easy.

pepfie   Link to this

Further pedantry to revisit mick d's arithmetical point:

(3 quid p.a. = ~2 d p.d.) ≠ (3 bob p.d. = 54 quid 15 bob p.a.)

Log in to post an annotation.

If you don't have an account, then register here.