This text was copied from Wikipedia on 17 June 2024 at 3:10AM.

The Duke of Monmouth

Portrait by Peter Lely, c. 1680
Born(1649-04-09)9 April 1649
Rotterdam, Dutch Republic
Died15 July 1685(1685-07-15) (aged 36)
Great Tower Hill, Tower of London, Liberties of the Tower, England
Issue9, including:
Military career
AllegianceKingdom of England
Service/branchEnglish Army
Years of service1665–1685

James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth, 1st Duke of Buccleuch, KG, PC (9 April 1649 – 15 July 1685) was a Dutch-born English nobleman and military officer. Originally called James Crofts or James Fitzroy, he was born in Rotterdam in the Netherlands, the eldest illegitimate son of Charles II of England with his mistress Lucy Walter.

The Duke of Monmouth served in the Second Anglo-Dutch War and commanded English troops taking part in the Third Anglo-Dutch War before commanding the Anglo-Dutch brigade fighting in the Franco-Dutch War. He led the unsuccessful Monmouth Rebellion in 1685, an attempt to depose his uncle King James II and VII. After one of his officers declared Monmouth the legitimate king in the town of Taunton in Somerset, Monmouth attempted to capitalise on his Protestantism and his position as the son of Charles II, in opposition to James, who had become a Roman Catholic. The rebellion failed, and Monmouth was beheaded for treason on 15 July 1685.


Parentage and early life

Charles, Prince of Wales (later becoming King Charles II), moved to The Hague in 1648, during the Second English Civil War, where his sister Mary and his brother-in-law William II, Prince of Orange, were based. The French relatives of Charles' mother, Queen Henrietta Maria, had invited Charles to wait out the war in France with the Queen, but he opted for the Netherlands, as he believed there was more support to be gained for the cause of his father, King Charles I, in the Netherlands than in France.[1] During the summer of 1648, the Prince of Wales became captivated by Lucy Walter, who was in The Hague for a short visit. The lovers were only eighteen, and she is often spoken of as his first mistress, though he may have begun having affairs as early as 1646.[2] Their son James was born in Rotterdam in the Netherlands on 9 April 1649, and spent his early years in Schiedam.[3]

Research by Hugh Noel Williams suggests that Charles had not arrived in The Hague until the middle of September 1648 – seven months before the child's birth, and that he had only met Lucy in July. It was later rumoured that in the summer of 1648 Lucy had been the mistress of Colonel Robert Sidney, a younger son of the Earl of Leicester.[4] As Charles had no legitimate surviving children, his younger brother James, Duke of York, was next in line to the throne.[3] When the boy grew up, those loyal to the Duke of York spread rumours about the young James' resemblance to Sidney.[3] These voices may have been encouraged by the Duke of York himself, who wished to prevent any of the fourteen royal bastards his brother acknowledged from gaining support in the succession.[3] In 2012, a DNA test of Monmouth's patrilineal descendant the 10th Duke of Buccleuch showed that he shared the same Y chromosome as a distant Stuart cousin; this is evidence that Charles II was indeed Monmouth's father.[5]

James had a younger sister or half-sister, Mary Crofts, whose father may have been Lord Taaffe. Mary later married the Irishman William Sarsfield, thus becoming the sister-in-law of the Jacobite general Patrick Sarsfield.[6]

As an illegitimate son, James was ineligible to succeed to the English or Scottish thrones, unless he could prove rumours that his parents had married secretly.[7] He came to maintain that his parents were married and that he possessed evidence of their marriage, but he never produced it.[8] King Charles II testified in writing to his Privy Council that he had never been married to anyone except his queen consort, Catherine of Braganza.[9]

In March 1658, young James was kidnapped by one of the King's men, sent to Paris, and placed in the care of William Crofts, 1st Baron Crofts, whose surname he took. He briefly attended a school in Familly.[3]

Officer and commander

James Scott at the siege of Maastricht in 1673, painter by Jan Wyck c. 1675

On 14 February 1663, almost 14 years old, shortly after having been brought to England, James was created Duke of Monmouth, with the subsidiary titles of Earl of Doncaster and Baron Scott of Tynedale, all three in the Peerage of England, and, on 28 March 1663, he was appointed a Knight of the Garter.[10]

On 20 April 1663, just days after his 14th birthday, the Duke of Monmouth was married to the heiress Anne Scott, 4th Countess of Buccleuch. He took his wife's surname upon marriage.[8] The day after his marriage, the couple were made Duke and Duchess of Buccleuch, Earl and Countess of Dalkeith, and Lord and Lady Scott of Whitchester and Eskdale in the Peerage of Scotland.[11] The Duke of Monmouth was popular, particularly for his Protestantism. The King's official heir presumptive, James, Duke of York, had openly converted to Roman Catholicism.[3]

In 1665, at the age of 16, Monmouth served in the English fleet under his uncle, the Duke of York, in the Second Anglo-Dutch War.[3] In June 1666, he returned to England to become captain of a troop of cavalry.[3] On 16 September 1668 he was made colonel of the His Majesty's Own Troop of Horse Guards.[3] He acquired Moor Park in Hertfordshire in April 1670.[12] Following the death in 1670, without a male heir, of Josceline Percy, 11th Earl of Northumberland, the earl's estates reverted to the Crown. King Charles II awarded the estates to Monmouth. The Countess of Northumberland successfully sued for the estates to be returned to the late Earl's only daughter and sole heiress, Lady Elizabeth Percy (1667–1722).[13]

At the outbreak of the Third Anglo-Dutch War in 1672, a brigade of 6,000 English and Scottish troops was sent to serve as part of the French army (in return for money paid to King Charles), with Monmouth as its commander.[3] He became Lord Lieutenant of the East Riding of Yorkshire and Governor of Kingston-upon-Hull in April 1673.[3] In the campaign of 1673 and in particular at the Siege of Maastricht that June, Monmouth gained a considerable reputation as one of Britain's finest soldiers.[3] He was reported to be replacing Marshal Schomberg as commander of England's Zealand Expedition, but this did not happen.[14]

In 1674, Monmouth became Chancellor of Cambridge University[15] and Master of the Horse, and King Charles II directed that all military orders should be brought first to Monmouth for examination, thus giving him effective command of the forces; his responsibilities included the movement of troops and the suppression of riots.[3] In March 1677, he also became Lord Lieutenant of Staffordshire.[3]

Claim to the Crown

Monmouth's execution on Tower Hill, 15 July 1685 (O.S), in a popular print

In 1678, Monmouth was the commander of the Anglo-Dutch brigade, now fighting for the United Provinces against the French, and he distinguished himself at the Battle of Saint-Denis in August that year during the Franco-Dutch War, further increasing his reputation.[16] The following year, after his return to Britain, he commanded the small army raised to put down the rebellion of the Scottish Covenanters and despite being heavily outnumbered, he decisively defeated the (admittedly poorly equipped) Covenanter rebels at the Battle of Bothwell Bridge on 22 June 1679.[3]


As his popularity with the masses increased, Monmouth was obliged to go into exile in the Dutch United Provinces in September 1679.[3] Following the discovery of the so-called Rye House Plot in 1683, which aimed to assassinate both Charles II and his brother James, Monmouth, who had been encouraged by his supporters to assert his right to the throne, was identified as a conspirator.[17] On King Charles II's death in February 1685, Monmouth led the Monmouth Rebellion, landing with three ships at Lyme Regis in Dorset in early June 1685, in an attempt to take the throne from his uncle, James II and VII.[18] He published a "Declaration for the defence and vindication of the protestant religion and of the laws, rights and privileges of England from the invasion made upon them, and for delivering the Kingdom from the usurpation and tyranny of us by the name of James, Duke of York": King James II and VII responded to this by issuing an order for the publishers and distributors of the paper to be arrested.[19]

Monmouth declared himself as the rightful King at various places along the route including Axminster, Chard,[20] Ilminster and Taunton.[3] The two armies met at the Battle of Sedgemoor on 6 July 1685, the last clear-cut pitched battle on open ground between two military forces fought on English soil: Monmouth's makeshift force could not compete with the regular army, and was soundly defeated.[21]


Following the battle a reward of £5,000 was offered for his capture.[22] On 8 July 1685, Monmouth was captured and arrested near Ringwood in Hampshire,[23] by tradition "in a field of peas". The events surrounding his capture are described by George Roberts in Tait's Edinburgh Magazine.[24]

Upon the 7th, about five in the morning, some of the Lord Lumley's said scouts riding in the road near Holt Lodge in Dorset, four miles [six kilometres] west of Ringwood in Hampshire, just at the turn of a cross way, surprised and seized two suspected persons, which, when the Lord Lumley came up, proved to be Lord Grey and Hollyday the guide. Lord Lumley now commenced a strict examination of the cottages scattered thickly over this heathy country, and called those to assist him who were acquainted with the locality. Sir William Portman was informed of the capture that had been made, and hastened to the spot, with as many of his horse and foot as he could suddenly get together. As Lord Lumley was making inquiries of the cottagers, a poor woman, Amy Farrant, directed him to a hedge, over which she had seen two men go. This hedge proved to be part of the outbounds of several enclosed fields, some overgrown with fern and brakes, and others sown with rye, peas, and oats. The assembled militia were placed around these outbounds, at short distances from each other, while horse and foot performed their assigned duty – that of beating about within.[25]

When the Duke had left his horse at Woodyates Inn, he exchanged clothes with a shepherd, who was soon discovered by local loyalists and interrogated. Dogs were then put onto the Duke's scent. Monmouth dropped his gold snuff box, full of gold pieces, in a pea field, where it was afterwards found.[26]

Monmouth's capture

From Woodyates Inn the Duke had gone to Shag's Heath, in the middle of which was a cluster of small farms, called the "Island". Amy Farrant gave information that the fugitives were concealed within the Island. The Duke, accompanied by Busse and Brandenburgher, remained concealed all day, with soldiers surrounding the area and threatening to set fire to the woodland. Brandenburgher deserted him at 1 am, and was later captured and interrogated, and is believed to have given away the Duke's hiding place. The spot was at the north-eastern extremity of the Island, now known as Monmouth's Close, in the manor of Woodlands, the property of the Earl of Shaftesbury. At about 7 am Henry Parkin, a militia soldier and servant of Samuel Rolle, discovered the brown skirt of Monmouth's coat as he lay hidden in a ditch covered with fern and brambles under an ash tree, and called for help. The Duke was seized. Bystanders shouted out "Shoot him! shoot him!", but Sir William Portman happening to be near the spot, immediately rode up, and laid hands on him as his prisoner. Monmouth was then "in the last extremity of hunger and fatigue, with no sustenance but a few raw peas in his pocket. He could not stand, and his appearance was much changed. Since landing in England, the Duke had not had a good night's rest, or eaten one meal in quiet, being perpetually agitated with the cares that attend unfortunate ambition". He had "received no other sustenance than the brook and the field afforded".[27]

The Duke was taken to Holt Lodge, in the parish of Wimborne, about one mile (1.5 kilometres) away, the residence of Anthony Etterick, a magistrate who asked the Duke what he would do if released, to which he answered: "that if his horse and arms were but restored to him at the same time, he needed only to ride through the army; and he defied them to take him again". The magistrate ordered him taken to London.[22]

Attainder and execution

Attainder, Duke of Monmouth Act 1685
Act of Parliament
Long titleAn Act to Attaint James Duke of Monmouth of High-Treason.
Citation1 Ja. 2. c. 2
Royal assent16 June 1685
Other legislation
Repealed byStatute Law Revision Act 1948
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

Following Monmouth's capture, Parliament passed an Act of Attainder, 1 Ja. 2. c. 2:[28]

Whereas James Duke of Monmouth has in an hostile Manner Invaded this Kingdom and is now in open Rebellion Laying War against the King contrary to the Duty of his Allegiance, Be it enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this Parliament assembled and by the Authorities of the same, That the said James Duke of Monmouth Stand and be Convicted and Attainted of High-Treason and that he suffer Paines of Death and Incurr all Forfeitures as a Traitor Convicted and Attainted of High Treason.[29]

The King took the unusual step of allowing his nephew an audience, despite having no intention of extending a pardon to him, thus breaking with a longstanding tradition that the King would give an audience only when he intended to show clemency. The prisoner unsuccessfully implored his mercy and even offered to convert to Catholicism, but to no avail. The King, disgusted by his abject behaviour, coldly told him to prepare to die, and later remarked that Monmouth "did not behave as well as I expected". Numerous pleas for mercy were addressed to the King, but he ignored them all, even that of his sister-in-law, the Dowager Queen Catherine.[30]

Etching of the execution of the Duke of Monmouth, by Jan Luyken.

Monmouth was beheaded by Jack Ketch on 15 July 1685, on Tower Hill.[31] Shortly beforehand, Bishops Turner of Ely and Ken of Bath and Wells visited the Duke to prepare him for eternity, but withheld the Eucharist, for the condemned man refused to acknowledge that either his rebellion or his relationship with Lady Wentworth had been sinful.[32] It is said that before laying his head on the block, Monmouth specifically bade Ketch finish him at one blow, saying he had mauled others before. Disconcerted, Ketch did indeed inflict multiple blows with his axe, the prisoner rising up reproachfully the while – a ghastly sight that shocked the witnesses, drawing forth execrations and groans. Some say a knife was at last employed to sever the head from the twitching body. Sources vary; some claim eight blows, the official Tower of London fact sheet says it took five blows,[33] while Charles Spencer, in his book Blenheim, puts it at seven.[34]

Monmouth was buried in the Church of St Peter ad Vincula in the Tower of London.[35] His Dukedom was forfeited, but his subsidiary titles, Earl of Doncaster and Baron Scott of Tindale, were restored by King George II on 23 March 1743 to his grandson Francis Scott, 2nd Duke of Buccleuch (1695–1751).[36]

Popular legends

According to legend, a portrait was painted of Monmouth after his execution: the tradition states that it was realised after the execution that there was no official portrait of the Duke, so his body was exhumed, the head stitched back on, and it was sat for its portrait to be painted.[37] However, there are at least two formal portraits of Monmouth tentatively dated to before his death currently in the National Portrait Gallery in London,[38] and another painting once identified with Monmouth that shows a sleeping or dead man that could have given rise to the story.[39]

One of the many theories about the identity of the Man in the Iron Mask is that he was Monmouth: the theory is that someone else was executed in his place, and James II arranged for Monmouth to be taken to France and put in the custody of his cousin Louis XIV of France.[40]

Henry Purcell set to music (Z. 481) a satirical poem by an unidentified author, ridiculing Monmouth and his parentage:[41]

A grasshopper and a fly,
In summer hot and dry,
In eager argument were met
About priority.

Says the fly to the grasshopper:
"From mighty race I spring,
Bright Phoebus was my dad 'tis known,
And I eat and drink with a king."

Says the grasshopper to the fly:
"Such rogues are still preferr'd;
Your father might be of high degree,
But your mother was but a turd."

So, rebel Jemmy Scott,
That did to the empire soar,
His father might be the Lord knows what,
But his mother we knew a whore.


James Scott's first coat of arms was initially granted in 1663 at the same time he was created Duke of Monmouth:[42] Quarterly, 1st and 4th, Ermine, on a Pile gules three Lions passant guardant or; 2nd and 3rd: Or, within a double Tressure flory counterflory gules, on an Inescutcheon azure, three Fleurs-de-Lys gold. Crest: Upon a Chapeau gules turned up ermine, a Dragon passant or gorged with a Crown having a Chain gules. Supporters: Dexter, a Unicorn argent, armed, maned and unguled or, gorged with a Crown having a Chain gules affixed thereto: Sinister, a Hart argent, attired and unguled or, gorged with a Crown having a Chain gules affixed thereto.[43]

This version of the arms, which consisted in a creative reorganisation of the Royal Arms, drew numerous complaints as it did not include any marker to signify his illegitimacy, and rumours that Charles might attempt to legitimise James started to spread.[42]

Four years later, after James' marriage, and with Charles' growing realisation that he would not legitimise him, a new design was granted:[42] the Arms of King Charles II debruised by a baton sinister Argent; An inescutcheon of Scott was added on top: Or, on a Bend azure a Mullet of six points between two Crescents of the field. To show the importance of James' marriage to Anne Scott, which he had married shortly after receiving his original arms. The Crest and Supporters from his previous arms were kept.[43]


Anna, Duchess of Buccleuch and her two surviving sons
Baroness Wentworth

His marriage to Anne Scott, 1st Duchess of Buccleuch resulted in the birth of six children:[11]

His affair with his mistress Eleanor Needham, daughter of Sir Robert Needham of Lambeth resulted in the birth of three children:[11]

Toward the end of his life he conducted an affair with Henrietta, Baroness Wentworth.[11]

Family tree

Edward Hyde
Charles I
Henry Hyde
Anne Hyde
James II & VII
Mary of Modena
Charles II
the old pretender
Mary II
William III & II
James Scott


  1. ^ Fraser 1979, pp. 55–56.
  2. ^ Seccombe, Thomas (1899). "Walter, Lucy" . In Lee, Sidney (ed.). Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 59. London: Smith, Elder & Co. pp. 259–260. cites Gardiner, Hist. of Civil War, iii. 238; Boero, Istoria...di Carlo II, Rome, 1863.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Harris, Tim (October 2009) [2004]. "Scott [Crofts], James, duke of Monmouth and first duke of Buccleuch (1649–1685)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/24879. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  4. ^ Williams, p. 6
  5. ^ "Scotland's DNA: Descended from lost tribes…and related to Napoleon". The Scotsman. 17 April 2012. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
  6. ^ Harrison, Bruce (2005). "The Family Forest Descendants of Lady Joan Beaufort". Milisecond Publishing. p. 532. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  7. ^ "Lucy Walter". Dictionary of Welsh Biography. National Library of Wales. Retrieved 13 May 2012.
  8. ^ a b "Scott, James Crofts, Duke of Monmouth". University of Hull. Retrieved 13 May 2012.
  9. ^ "Setting the Scene in Wessex: the 17th Century in Literature and Drama". Retrieved 13 May 2012.
  10. ^ Brydges, Sir Egerton (1812). Collins's Peerage of England; Genealogical, Biographical and Historical. Vol. 3. F.C. and J. Rivington. p. 511.
  11. ^ a b c d Burke, Bernard (1914). Genealogical and Heraldic Dictionary of the Peerage and Baronetage of the British Empire. London: Burke's Peerage Limited. p. 320.
  12. ^ "Moor Park". Archived from the original on 12 December 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
  13. ^ "Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 13, 1675-1681". British History Online. His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1767-1830. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
  14. ^ Watson p.67-68
  15. ^ "Monmouth, James, Duke of Monmouth (MNMT663J)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge.
  16. ^ "No. 1328". The London Gazette. 8 August 1678. p. 1.
  17. ^ "No. 1848". The London Gazette. 2 August 1683. p. 2.
  18. ^ "No. 2042". The London Gazette. 11 June 1685. p. 1.
  19. ^ "No. 2043". The London Gazette. 15 June 1685. p. 1.
  20. ^ "King Crowned in Chard". Chard Tourist Guide. 26 June 2005. Retrieved 13 May 2012.
  21. ^ "No. 2049". The London Gazette. 6 July 1685. p. 1.
  22. ^ a b Roberts, p. 109
  23. ^ "No. 2050". The London Gazette. 9 July 1685. p. 1.
  24. ^ Roberts, George (1 January 1845). The Life and Rebellion of the Duke of Monmouth. Vol. 12. Tait's Edinburgh Magazine. p. 57.
  25. ^ "Official account published by command", quoted in Tait's Edinburgh Magazine
  26. ^ "Sword of the Duke of Monmouth". Archaeological Journal. 21: 62–63. 1864. doi:10.1080/00665983.1864.10851277.
  27. ^ Tait's Edinburgh Magazine
  28. ^ Raithby, p.2
  29. ^ The Statutes of the Realm, vol. VI (1819); James the Second, 1685: An Act to Attaint James Duke of Monmouth of High-Treason. Chapter II. Rot. Parl. nu. 2. at, accessed 23 April 2020
  30. ^ Beatty, p. 60
  31. ^ "No. 2051". The London Gazette. 13 July 1685. p. 2.
  32. ^ Macaulay, p.491
  33. ^ "Tower of London: Fact sheet" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 March 2009. Retrieved 10 October 2009.
  34. ^ Spencer, p.54: "Monmouth had a particularly grisly end, the executioner's axe striking seven times before his head severed"
  35. ^ "The Chapel of St. Peter ad Vincula and Tower Green". English Monarchs. Retrieved 24 September 2017.
  36. ^ "Earl of Doncaster". Archived from the original on 19 January 2021. Retrieved 19 May 2012.
  37. ^ "Tourist Sights Portrait of the Duke of Monmouth in England". Retrieved 13 May 2012.
  38. ^ "National Portrait Gallery NPG 151". National Portrait. Archived from the original on 17 December 2007. Retrieved 13 May 2012.
  39. ^ "National Portrait Gallery NPG 1566". National Portrait. Archived from the original on 25 February 2008. Retrieved 13 May 2012.
  40. ^ Shaw, Samuel, "Duke of Monmouth: Man in the Iron Mask", in Oxford Journals (Oxford, 1870), Vol s4-V, No 120.
  41. ^ Spink, Ian (ed.). Henry Purcell: Duets, Dialogues and Trios. Vol. 22B (Purcell Society ed.). Purcell Society. Archived from the original on 10 September 2018. Retrieved 4 December 2016.
  42. ^ a b c Holder, Samantha. "The Baton Sinister". The Wrong Side of the Blanket. Retrieved 13 January 2024.
  43. ^ a b Murdock, Paul J. "Illegitimate Royal Offspring". A Royal Heraldry. Retrieved 19 January 2024.


Further reading

1893 text

James, the son of Charles II. by Lucy Walter, daughter of William Walter, of Roch Castle, co. Pembroke. He was born April 9th, 1649, and landed in England with the Queen-Mother, July 28th, 1662, when he bore the name of Crofts, after Lord Crofts, his governor. He was created Duke of Monmouth, February 14th, 1663, and married Lady Anne Scott, daughter and heiress of Francis, second Earl of Buccleuch, on April 20th following. In 1673 he took the name of Scott, and was created Duke of Buccleuch.

This text comes from a footnote on a diary entry in the 1893 edition edited by Henry B. Wheatley.

9 Annotations

First Reading

Paul Chapin  •  Link

Married at the age of 14
I checked other authorities to see if there was an error in the dates, but the entry is correct.

Second Reading

Bill  •  Link

James, duke of Monmouth, was a natural son of Charles II. by Mrs. Lucy Walters, daughter of Richard Walters, of Haverford West, in the county of Pembroke. Courage and good nature, youth and beauty, ambition and pliancy of temper, contributed to render him the favourite of his father, the minion of the people, and the tool of faction. Accumulated wealth and honour, universal popularity and royal favour, though more than he could well bear, did not satisfy him. He knew not how to be happy without sovereignty, while he enjoyed all its advantages, without any of its cares. He even pretended that he had a right to the succession; and it is certain that the king for some time connived at his ambition, as he thought his faction a proper counter-balance to that of the duke of York. The earl of Shaftesbury, who managed him as he thought fit, first formed the project of raising him to the throne.
---A Biographical History of England. J. Granger, 1779.

Bill  •  Link

[T]he son of Charles II. by Lucy Waters, daughter of Richard Waters, of Haverfordwest, who bore the name of Crofts till he was created Duke of Monmouth in 1662, previously to his marriage with Lady Anne Scott, daughter to Francis, Earl of Buccleuch; from which match the present Duke of Buccleuch descends.
---Diary and correspondence of Samuel Pepys, the diary deciphered by J. Smith. 1854.

Bill  •  Link

SCOTT, JAMES (known as Fitzroy and as Crofts), Duke of Monmouth And Buccleuch (1649-1685), natural son of Charles II, by Lucy, daughter of Richard Walters of Haverfordwest; born at the Hague; entrusted on his mother's death to the care of Lord Crofts, as whose kinsman he passed; instructed in protestant religion; acknowledged by Charles II as his son, 1663, and made Baron Tyndale, Earl of Doncaster, Duke of Monmouth, and K.G.; married Anne Scott, countess of Buccleuch, and took surname of Scott, 1663; captain of Charles II’s lifeguard of horse, 1668; privy councillor, 1670; captain-general of Charles II's forces, 1670; served against Dutch, 1672 and 1673; chancellor of Cambridge University, 1674; served against the French at Ostend and Mons, 1678; identified himself with protestant movement in England; quelled insurrection which ensued in Scotland on murder of Archbishop Sharp, 1679; deprived of commission as general, in consequence of reaction in favour of Duke of York, and banished, 1679; retired to Holland, but returned immediately and was deprived of all offices; deprived of chancellorship of Cambridge, 1682; made progress through west of England, and was arrested at Taunton, but released on bail; joined Russell, Essex, and Sidney in plot to murder Charles II and Duke of York; in conjunction with Essex, Howard, Russell, Hampden, and Sidney arranged for risings in England and Scotland; was promised pardon, having revealed to Charles II all he knew of the conspiracy after its discovery, but was banished from the court; retired to Zealand, 1684; treated with marked respect by Prince of Orange, who, however, dismissed him on death of Charles II; arranged with Argyll and Ferguson expedition to England; landed at Lyme Regis, 11 June 1685, and claimed as 'head and captain-general of protestant forces of the kingdom' a ‘legitimate and legal' right to the crown; was proclaimed king at Taunton, 20 June; defeated by Feversham and Churchill at Sedgemoor, 5 July; escaped, but was captured; executed in the Tower of London, 15 July. Portraits of him by Lely and W. Wissing are in the National Portrait Gallery.
---Dictionary of National Biography: Index and Epitome. S. Lee, 1906.

San Diego Sarah  •  Link

Why does Pepys refer to James Crofts as the Duke of Monmouth in December 1662? I have paraphrased from the encyclopedia entry:

James Crofts was created Duke of Monmouth on 14 February 1663, at the age of 14, shortly after having been brought to England, with the subsidiary titles of Earl of Doncaster and Baron Scott of Tynedale, all three in the Peerage of England, and on 28 March 1663 he was appointed a Knight of the Garter. On 20 April 1663, Sir James Crofts, Duke of Monmouth was married to the heiress Anne Scott, 4th Countess of Buccleuch, at which time he took the last name of Scott.

Bill  •  Link

SP referred to Crofts in October and Monmouth in November and December, 1662. I infer that the title was announced a few months before it was actually conferred.

Log in to post an annotation.

If you don't have an account, then register here.