Thursday 6 September 1666

Up about five o’clock, and where met Mr. Gawden at the gate of the office (I intending to go out, as I used, every now and then to-day, to see how the fire is) to call our men to Bishop’s-gate, where no fire had yet been near, and there is now one broke out which did give great grounds to people, and to me too, to think that there is some kind of plot1 in this (on which many by this time have been taken, and, it hath been dangerous for any stranger to walk in the streets), but I went with the men, and we did put it out in a little time; so that that was well again. It was pretty to see how hard the women did work in the cannells, sweeping of water; but then they would scold for drink, and be as drunk as devils. I saw good butts of sugar broke open in the street, and people go and take handsfull out, and put into beer, and drink it. And now all being pretty well, I took boat, and over to Southwarke, and took boat on the other side the bridge, and so to Westminster, thinking to shift myself, being all in dirt from top to bottom; but could not there find any place to buy a shirt or pair of gloves, Westminster Hall being full of people’s goods, those in Westminster having removed all their goods, and the Exchequer money put into vessels to carry to Nonsuch; but to the Swan, and there was trimmed; and then to White Hall, but saw nobody; and so home. A sad sight to see how the River looks: no houses nor church near it, to the Temple, where it stopped. At home, did go with Sir W. Batten, and our neighbour, Knightly (who, with one more, was the only man of any fashion left in all the neighbourhood thereabouts, they all removing their goods and leaving their houses to the mercy of the fire), to Sir R. Ford’s, and there dined in an earthen platter — a fried breast of mutton; a great many of us, but very merry, and indeed as good a meal, though as ugly a one, as ever I had in my life. Thence down to Deptford, and there with great satisfaction landed all my goods at Sir G. Carteret’s safe, and nothing missed I could see, or hurt. This being done to my great content, I home, and to Sir W. Batten’s, and there with Sir R. Ford, Mr. Knightly, and one Withers, a professed lying rogue, supped well, and mighty merry, and our fears over. From them to the office, and there slept with the office full of labourers, who talked, and slept, and walked all night long there. But strange it was to see Cloathworkers’ Hall on fire these three days and nights in one body of flame, it being the cellar full of oyle.

  1. The terrible disaster which overtook London was borne by the inhabitants of the city with great fortitude, but foreigners and Roman Catholics had a bad dime. As no cause for the outbreak of the fire could be traced, a general cry was raised that it owed its origin to a plot. In a letter from Thomas Waade to Williamson (dated “Whitby, Sept. 14th”) we read, “The destruction of London by fire is reported to be a hellish contrivance of the French, Hollanders, and fanatic party” (“Calendar of State Papers,” 1666-67, p. 124).

16 Annotations

Terry Foreman   Link to this

John Evelyn's Diary

6 September
http://www.pepysdiary.com/indepth/2009/09/02/ev...

mary k mcintyre   Link to this

One of Sam's great charms (like Cleopatra) is his infinite variety. In one entry we have drunken street women drinking sugared beer (oy!), Westminster piled with local residents' worldly goods, an aborted effort to buy a clean shirt, a haircut, and a dish of fried mutton (echh). Oh... and one's house overrun w/insomniac labourers.

Australian Susan   Link to this

It was only in the 19th century that the inscription on The Monument which blamed Catholics was removed. The myth lingered.

"..and there dined in an earthen platter — a fried breast of mutton; a great many of us, but very merry, and indeed as good a meal, though as ugly a one, as ever I had in my life. .."

Sam describes a universal feeling I can relate to: the best meal I ever had in my life was the fry-up lunch (I had had no breakfast, being too anxious) my family ate at a greasy spoon near the Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital after we had had the reassurance that there was nothing wrong with my young son's heart. To know you have got through something safely and to share companionship and food brings a sense of relief and goodwill. Sam can now concentrate on the little things like getting shaved and trying to find a clean shirt, knowing the threat to his household is over.

Michael Robinson   Link to this

“The destruction of London by fire is reported to be a hellish contrivance of the French, Hollanders, and fanatic party”

Spoiler

For a text of the relevant inscription on the Monument, as now:

http://www.themonument.info/history/north_panel...

Whatever may have been supposed at the time, it appears the 'Papist' text to the inscription was an addition of 1680/81, at the time of the 'Popish Plot' hysteria, and its addition and removal subject to the prevailing sympathies of the day: "Soon after the accession of James II the additional inscriptions were obliterated and removed. But the order was reversed on the accession of William ill,"
http://www.themonument.info/history/east_panel_...

Terry Foreman   Link to this

"the women did work in the cannells [street drainage-gutters], sweeping of water; but then they would scold for drink"

scold http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_scold

Robert Gertz   Link to this

"...Mr. Knightly, and one Withers, a professed lying rogue..."

Ok, so Sam was reincarnated as Jane Austin...

Though I suppose Withers actually sounds more Shakespearian. Profession: "lying rogue". How did it get established his name was Robert (link)? Wish Sam had given us his story directly...I'm assuming he was a low-level Navy Office fellow they found poking about (looting?)and set him to work helping them.

Terry Foreman   Link to this

"How did it get established his name was Robert (link)?"

Sorry about that. RG. 'Twas not any "Robert" Pepys calls "a a professed lying rogue”: L&M think it was "probably" Robert Withers, a shipbuilder, of Bolton-le-Sands, Lancs., as you assume, "a low-level Navy...."

Ruben   Link to this

...meantime on the other side of the channel...
the only hot thing was Louis XIV sexual life.
Those who care for some details but will not bother to read Voltaire, see: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/books/review/...
I think Louis was the model for Charles, but Louis had more power and money.

Ruben   Link to this

"the Exchequer money put into vessels to carry to Nonsuch"
King Henry used to make the trip to nearby Hampton Court by a fast rowing boat.
But Nonsuch was not on the river side.
Today I would take may boat or whatever to Kingston Town End Pier a little before Hampton Court and then by truck or similar, with the help of my GPS, through A307, Brighton Road, etc., some 7 Km away.
How did the Exchequer money travel till Nonsuch? Suggestions?

Australian Susan   Link to this

Exchequer Money

On pack ponies from Kingston, with a substantial armed guard?

Robert Gertz   Link to this

No need for apologies, I was impressed L&M would have the first name of such a minor character like Withers.

Still, it's a shame we don't get more about him and his rogue's profession. I feel we lost a good story...

Robert Gertz   Link to this

“the Exchequer money put into vessels to carry to Nonsuch”

Thankfully oftentimes the faith and loyalty of people is as amazing as the perfidity.

CGS   Link to this

withers - the highest point of the shoulder seen best with horse standing square and head slightly lowered. The tops of the two shoulder blades and the space between them define the withers.

Nix   Link to this

“The destruction of London by fire is reported to be a hellish contrivance of the French, Hollanders, and fanatic party” --

Round up the usual suspects.

Australian Susan   Link to this

Don't forget those untrustworthy Papists!

Terry Foreman   Link to this

Letter Calendared in the Carte Collection

Arlington to Ormond
Written from: Whitehall

Date: 7 September 1666

Shelfmark: MS. Carte 46, fol(s). 363-364

Document type: Holograph

... Though many parts of the government, as well as [an] infinite number of "particulars will suffer" [by the late fire], "yet we are reasonably secure the quiet of the kingdom will not be discomposed by it; not being able, by any of the circumstances, to trace out, or to suspect, that it was either contrived or fomented by any of the discontented party".

Adds that the fear of such a possibility induced the King to send for the Lord General [Duke of Albemarle], ... and this (eventually) delivered his Majesty "from another pain he was in, [in] observing his sea-service in some disorder, by having it commanded by two heads, that were in danger of disagreeing" ... http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/dept/scwmss/projects...

Log in to post an annotation.

If you don't have an account, then register here.