Wednesday 3 April 1661

Up among my workmen, my head akeing all day from last night’s debauch. To the office all the morning, and at noon dined with Sir W. Batten and Pen, who would needs have me drink two drafts of sack to-day to cure me of last night’s disease, which I thought strange but I think find it true.1

Then home with my workmen all the afternoon, at night into the garden to play on my flageolette, it being moonshine, where I staid a good while, and so home and to bed.

This day I hear that the Dutch have sent the King a great present of money, which we think will stop the match with Portugal; and judge this to be the reason that our so great haste in sending the two ships to the East Indys is also stayed.

  1. The proverb, “A hair of the dog that bit you,” which probably had originally a literal meaning, has long been used to inculcate the advice of the two Sir Williams.

33 Annotations

dirk   Link to this

"at night into the garden to play on my flageolette (...) where I staid a good while"

A nuisance to the neighbours, I imagine. Lucky that Sam didn't get any flower pots thrown at his head. Some people need their sleep, you know!

Paul Brewster   Link to this

which we think will stop the match with Portugal
per L&M, "Both Holland and Spain spent lavishly in unsuccessful attempts to stop [the marriage alliance between Charles II and Catherine of Braganza]".

dirk   Link to this

hangovers & remedies

"Ethanol, the major alcoholic chemical in most drinks, seems to only play a small part in producing the thirst, headache, fatigue, nausea, sweating, tremor, remorse and anxiety which are typical of a hangover. What ARE important are things called congeners - complex organic molecules such as polyphenols, higher alcohols including methanol, histamine, tannins or fusel oils. Some people suggest that methanol is the real villain because it is metabolised to formaldehyde and formic acid, and it is these chemicals which cause the symptoms of a hangover. (...) Beware 'hair of the dog' remedies (i.e., more alcohol as a hangover cure). They do actually help hangover symptoms initially, because the ethanol in the drinks blocks the breakdown of methanol to formaldehyde and formic acid. However, you may just be delaying the pain!"
From:
http://www.firstaidcafe.co.uk/Reference/Hangove...

Paul Brewster   Link to this

will stop the mach with Portugal
L&M substitute the word "mach" for "match". I thought it was a typo in my printing of L&M (second printing 1971) until I looked it up in the OED and found this entry: "mach, obs. form of match n. and v.". I'd sure be curious about the shorthand in this case.

Judy   Link to this

Thank you Dirk for the information on hangovers. I wonder how Sam stood the pain in his aking head.

vincent   Link to this

Moon shine: The sky must have been very clear as new moon was on 30 of March. Moon rise, to-day was approx 11am so the moon was close to setting.
scrounged from :
http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/phase/pha...

Birdie   Link to this

Vincent, re: moon
You forget that Pepys was on the Julian calendar. Today's diary date would be April 13 (approx) on the Julian calendar.

Birdie   Link to this

I mean April 13 on the Gregorian calendar (our modern day calendar).

Xjy   Link to this

"the Dutch have sent the King a great present of money"
Diplomacy in a nutshell. And if you can't buy 'em, you knife 'em. The higher you go, the more brutal, corrupt and rotten it gets. And of course Sam swallows it all without blinking... Mind you, today he needed some time to himself with his flageolet to calm his mind.

Kevin Sheerstone   Link to this

"...I thought strange but I think find it true."

Is Sam really saying that "the hair of the dog" is new to him? Implausible, to put it mildly.

Lawrence   Link to this

Remembering that Sam is on the Julian calendar, that full moon will be tomorrow the 4th of April.
http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/index.html?...

David Goldfarb   Link to this

Which means that April 5th will be Good Friday and the 7th, Easter.

Lawrence   Link to this

Interestingly Sam has a blue moon in His July 1661 (Julian Calendar) as we do here in 2004 (Gregorian) For those who are not sure what a blue moon is look here. http://www.obliquity.com/astro/bluemoon.html

Mary   Link to this

Easter Day 1661 is not until April 14th.

JWB   Link to this

Dowsing Sam...
Remember when Sam was dowsed though a scuttle during morning washdown aboad ship. That was after an evening's music, I think. Beware of Mrs. Davis.

vincent   Link to this

Re: Julian and Gregory: 'Tis Easter that caused the mixup:
the moon would take approx 29.5**** or so days to have the moon full again.
Easter, according to Pepys is on the 14th: so should the moon be full?
reading Pepys it seeems full moon is now the fourth.
The ecclesiastical rules are:
Easter falls on the first Sunday following the first ecclesiastical full moon that occurs on or after the day of the vernal equinox;
this particular ecclesiastical full moon is the 14th day of a tabular lunation (new moon); and
the vernal equinox is fixed as March 21.
want to compute Easter
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/easter.html
another site:http://www.holiday-central.net/easter_move.asp
pascal moon:
http://www.holiday-central.net/easter_paschal_m...
to calc for 1661=
http://www.holiday-central.net/easter_calculato...

vincent   Link to this

re: calendars section
http://www.pepysdiary.com/background/?c=reference

vincent   Link to this

Re: Lawrences leads and Sams entries are in agreement.
How come the English Church would not go with Gregory ? [ I guess the normal reason, Political egos].On what basis did Easter and Lent get calculated by the English Church? was this the religious out, the Pascal moon?
the Pascal moon was
19 goes evenly 87 times into 1661 (19 x 87 = 1653)
the remainder is 8. (1661 - 1653 = 8)
Add 1 to this number 9, this is the Golden Number (8 + 1 = 9)
The Paschal moon is 4/16/1661

http://www.holiday-central.net/easter_paschal_m...

Birdie   Link to this

Vincent, Sam's entry and the NASA webpage (that you gave and that shows phases of the moon 1601 to 1700) are also in agreement. As I tried to point out, Sam is on the Julian calendar and NASA uses the current Gregorian calendar.

Lawrence   Link to this

Vincent I wish I knew half of what you'd forgot about this subject on Easter, and thanks for the great leads.

Michael   Link to this

"How come the English Church would not go with Gregory ?"
The pope simply ordered the new calendar to be adopted, which led most non-catholic countries of Europe promptly into resisting that move. The chaos resulting from that can be imagined. However, in the long run the new calendar was simply better and thus was slowly adopted - in some countries more slowly than in others, and England was among the more stubborn.

Andrew Hamilton   Link to this

Easter 1661

If I understand the rule (Easter is the first Sunday after the first eccelsiastical full moon on or after the Vernal equinox of March 21, and the ecclesiastical full moon comes 14 days after the new moon), and Easter fell on April 14, 1661, the ecclesiatical full moon in question, or "paschal moon" for 1661 could not have come before April 7 or after April 13, and the new moon would have fallen 14 days earlier, between March 24 and March 31. If NASA (op. cit.) is using the Gregorian calendar (GC) and if the Julian calendar in use in Britain in 1661 is ten days behind the GC, then the NASA new moon date of March 30 GC would be March 20 Julian, and its full moon date of April 14 GC would be April 4 Julian. These dates fall outside the dates predicted by the formula. Its a puzzle.

Susan   Link to this

Tsarist Russia held to the Julian calendar until after the Revolution. I think they must have been the last country in Europe to change. Apropos of this, Orthodox Easter is always a week after Catholic Easter (Australian Greeks get cheap Easter eggs!) - I'm not sure how this fits in with paschal moons and I don't know why they are different. This applies to Russian, Serbian & Greek Orthodox churches here in Brisbane, but not the Lebanese Orthodox Christians who have the same Easter weekend as us Anglicans. Confused?

Rich Merne   Link to this

Yes,....suffice that it seems you could actually see the moon then, in clear skys over London. Anybody lucky enough to still be able to view the heavens through unpolluted skys will appreciate.

Susan   Link to this

Really good website on calendars.
http://astro.nmsu.edu/~lhuber/leaphist.html

See section 2.2 for Easter calculations.

Susan   Link to this

And here is how to calulate Easter for the Gregorian calendar, the Julian calendar, the Orthodox church etc. Including Epacts and Golden Numbers!
http://www.tondering.dk/claus/cal/node3.html

Andrew Hamilton   Link to this

Easter 1661

Having wasted many a pleasant minute with the Tondering site given us by Susan, I am able to report my conclusion that Easter 1661 fell, correctly under the Julian system, on April 14. Had the Gregorian calendar been in use (as it was in Catholic countries), Easter would have been a week later, on April 21, Gregorian, which would have been the same day as Thursday April 11 in Britain. The Tondering site further confirms that the NASA site given by Vincent correctly places the full moon on April 14, Gregorian. However, a curiosity emerges. The Paschal full moon (which we are told can vary from the actual full moon by as much as a day) fell on Sunday April 7, 1661, Julian calendar, according to the Tondering formulas. But the actual full moon, as calculated by NASA, would have fallen on April 4, Julian, or the day after today's entry by Sam about bringht moonshine. This conclusion is arrived at by subtracting the 10 day difference between Gregorian and Julian calendars at that time (actually, it was closer to 10.5 days). If this actual full moon date had been used by ecclesiatical authorities, Easter would have fallen on April 7, 1661 in London, not April 14. I'm not sure what to make of the difference.

Andrew Hamilton   Link to this

Easter correction:
I should have said Gregorian Easter 1661 fell three days earlier than Julian Easter, not a week later. Sorry.

dirk   Link to this

Easter calculations

Re - Andrew Hamilton e.a.

If the rule for the calculation were simply to take the first sunday after the first full moon of spring, Easter 1661 should have fallen on April 7th. The thing is that the above is merely a rule of thumb, which gives the correct result in almost all cases. But the actual calculation of the Easter date is more complicated than that, because the 19 year moon cycle is taken into account (metonic cycle). The way this is done differs for the Julian (British) calendar and the Gregorian (continental) calendar. Calculations are fairly complex, but you can get a fairly accurate idea of what's involved ("Golden Number", "Epact" etc) browsing through the Tondering site.

This should "explain" why Easter 1661 fell on the "wrong" date (with a full moon on April 4th).

vincent   Link to this

Rich : smoke gets in your eyes:"to moon?" From J Evelyn:
"...Smoake issuing from one or two Tunnels neer Northumberland-House, and not far from Scotland-yard, did so invade the Court; that all the Rooms, Galleries, and Places about it were fill'd and infested with it; and that to such a degree, as Men could hardly discern one another for the Clowd, and none could support, without manifest Inconveniency..."
John Evelyn: http://astext.com/history/fumifug.html

jude cooper   Link to this

Ten years on and still burbling about calendars! Thought you might like to know that Cwm Gwuan in pembrokeshire still uses the Julien calendar when celebrating new year. We also perform our mummers play on old twelfth night in Herefordshire.

Weavethe hawk   Link to this

Becomes awfully long winded at times, doesn't it?

Chris Squire UK   Link to this

Here's the up to date Tondering link:

'The “Christian calendar” is the term traditionally used to designate the calendar commonly in use, although it originated in pre-Christian Rome . . (it) has years of 365 or 366 days. It is divided into 12 months that have no relationship to the motion of the moon . . Two main versions . . have existed in recent times: The Julian . . and the Gregorian . . The difference between them lies in the way they approximate the length of the tropical year and their rules for calculating Easter. But (both) inherited a lot of their structure from the ancient Roman calendar. Therefore a study of that calendar is also relevant here.'
http://www.tondering.dk/claus/cal/christian.php

Log in to post an annotation.

If you don't have an account, then register here.