Thursday 2 February 1659/60

Drank at Harper’s with Doling, and so to my office, where I found all the officers of the regiments in town, waiting to receive money that their soldiers might go out of town, and what was in the Exchequer they had. At noon after dining at home I called at Harper’s for Doling, and he and I met with Luellin and drank with him at the Exchequer at Charing Cross, and thence he and I went to the Temple to Mr. Calthrop’s chamber, and from thence had his man by water to London Bridge to Mr. Calthrop, a grocer, and received 60l. for my Lord. In our way we talked with our waterman, White, who told us how the watermen had lately been abused by some that had a desire to get in to be watermen to the State, and had lately presented an address of nine or ten thousand hands to stand by this Parliament, when it was only told them that it was to a petition against hackney coaches; and that to-day they had put out another to undeceive the world and to clear themselves, and that among the rest Cropp, my waterman and one of great practice, was one that did cheat them thus. After I had received the money we went to the Bridge Tavern and drank a quart of wine and so back by water, landing Mr. Calthrop’s man at the Temple and we went homewards, but over against Somerset House, hearing the noise of guns, we landed and found the Strand full of soldiers. So I took my money and went to Mrs. Johnson, my Lord’s sempstress, and giving her my money to lay up, Doling and I went up stairs to a window, and looked out and see the foot face the horse and beat them back, and stood bawling and calling in the street for a free Parliament and money. By and by a drum was heard to beat a march coming towards them, and they got all ready again and faced them, and they proved to be of the same mind with them; and so they made a great deal of joy to see one another. After all this, I took my money, and went home on foot and laying up my money, and changing my stockings and shoes, I this day having left off my great skirt suit, and put on my white suit with silver lace coat, and went over to Harper’s, where I met with W. Simons, Doling, Luellin and three merchants, one of which had occasion to use a porter, so they sent for one, and James the soldier came, who told us how they had been all day and night upon their guard at St. James’s, and that through the whole town they did resolve to stand to what they had began, and that to-morrow he did believe they would go into the City, and be received there.

After all this we went to a sport called, selling of a horse for a dish of eggs and herrings, and sat talking there till almost twelve o’clock and then parted, they were to go as far as Aldgate. Home and to bed.

36 Annotations

M. Stolzenbach   Link to this

"I this day having left off my great skirt suit, and put on my white suit with silver lace coat"

Here Mr Pepys shows, I think, his almost childlike delight in fine clothes.

The watermen had indeed been gravely tricked, it would seem, by being, in such uncertain times, sucked into unknowingly signing a petition with political implications.

Rita   Link to this

The political background to this exciting scene of Pepys observing the street theatre of a revolution in progress, is that no-one was really in charge of the government. There was a struggle between parliament and the army for control (at this point the common soldiers are calling the shots) - it was this chaos that led everyone, even some old Cromwell hands, Pepys's "my lord" among them, to finally throw their support to the restoration of the monarchy - I trust no-one will take this as a spoiler!

Fred Coleman   Link to this

"Selling of a Horse for a Dish of Eggs and Herrings" - now what in the world is THAT all about??!!! We may never know - the best that Latham and Matthews could come up with in their footnote was "possibly a game of chance". I wonder if someone out there has access to a reference work of games played in England at this time. It would be interesting to know more.

oliver   Link to this

"...I this day having left off my great skirt suit..."

What is a skirt suit? Does anyone have
access to a picture or drawing?

Susanna   Link to this

"my great skirt suit"

As noted on January 1, 1659/60, Pepys seems to have taken up the French fashion of wearing "petticoat breeches". There is an illustration of these, and of other 17th Century fashions, at this website:

http://www.costumes.org/pages/fashiondress/17th...

Andrew Caley   Link to this

Watermen
The Thames back then must have been a great sight with thousands of watermen working on it. To see the Thames today largely unused and bare of river traffic is a sad one.
The following links give an idea of the importance of the watermen at that time. A profession now virtually gone. Will computer programmers go the same way, I wonder!
History of Thames Watermen
http://www.geocities.com/thameswatermen/

Records of the Company of Waterman and Lightermen at Guildhall Library
http://www.ihrinfo.ac.uk/gh/water.htm

Still questions today about competition to the watermen!
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co....

The Company of Watermen and Lightermen of the River Thames
http://www.stringofpearls.org.uk/pearl70/pea70.asp

PHE   Link to this

Every pub in London?
You get the impression that Sam has an ambition to visit every tavern in London, as he is continually visting ones not mentioned before. It's interesting, as today, most regular pub goers will have a small number of favourites. I'm sure someone has counted up the number of different taverns mentioned in the diaries. If not, maybe someone wants to volunteer!

James Casey   Link to this

Hackney coaches. Presuming these are the ancestors of taxis? Because taxis are still called 'hackney carriages' in London to this day.

Jackie   Link to this

It seems that the sharp practice of getting people to sign a petition for one thing and submitting it as something else goes back a long way.

No wonder that the Watermen were upset - told that they were putting their support to a petition to stop Hackney coaches from taking business off them and then discovering that apparently that instead they'd made a strong political stand that looked like it might turn out very dangerous in the next few weeks!

PHE   Link to this

Hackney carriages
Many UK cities have taxis that are "licensed Hackney Carriages". I beleive this applies to taxis that are permitted to display a 'for hire' sign and can pick up passengers who hail them on the street. Other taxis are not permitted to do this and can only collect passengers by appointment. Licensing as a hackney carriage is more rigorous than for a standard taxi - particularly in London where they must pass the famous 'Knowledge'. When was this requirement introduced? Its interesting to see how the watermen saw the new Hackney Carriages as a threat to their livlihood. Obviously, the river was the major means for travelling larger distances around London, particularly when there was only one bridge. As history shows, the hackney carriages won in the end .

Joe   Link to this

I believe even to this day there is an old law in effect that hackney carriages must carry a bale of hay for the horse.
Can anyone confirm this, or have I fallen for an urban myth?

j a gioia   Link to this

In New York City

"hack" is still slang for a taxi cab.

Jackie   Link to this

It's true - Hackney carriages (as opposed to private hire cabs) must carry a bale of hay "for the horse".

The same applies in Manchester too which has a proper licenced hackney cab (or black cab) system. All hackney carriage drivers must be able to display their bale of hay on demand as part of a condition of their licence.

In exchange for this, and the drivers having the "knowledge" the public know that their cab driver has their criminal record thoroughly checked and their insurance up to date, so that if anything goes wrong, the fare paying public are as protected as it's possible for them to be, as well as knowing where they are going.

Incidentally, the law does not state how BIG the bale of hay must be - there's a company which specialises in making minature bales of hay which fit into the glove compartment.

Todd Bernhardt   Link to this

re: mini-bales of hay...

Hilarious! If only we in the U.S. could be as sure of the contents of a NYC hack's glove compartment ... plenty of "HEY!!" abounds in that environment, but not much hay...

Sounds like it'll be interesting the next time Pepys meets up with "Cropp, my waterman and one of great practice, [who] was one that did cheat them thus."

Phil   Link to this

Can you point us at any of the manufacturers of these miniature bales of hay Jackie? I'm less than convinced.

There may well have been a law along these lines at some time, but I reckon it's since been repealed (although maybe not until fairly recently).

Glyn   Link to this

Hackney carriages could carry up to 4 people and were pulled by 2 horses. Minimum fare was one shilling and then it went up according to distance. They were useful if you were in a hurry but you would probably have to share with 2 or 3 strangers going in the same direction. However, the driver would get annoyed if you tried to share the fare - each person had to pay their own amount - so he would get 4 times as much if the carriage was full.

So General Monck and the army have finally marched into London - dangerous times.

Phil   Link to this

Half way down this page http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/524998.stm it says "Pity the poor taxi driver who, until 1976,. could be commanded by a policeman to reveal his or her bale of hay. If they did not have one in the boot [trunk], then they were clearly ill-treating their horse."

This would presumably be the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976, which I can't find online. (Thanks Nick!)

david   Link to this

A little bit more on the bales of hay...

http://www.dumblaws.com/explanations/explanatio...

language hat   Link to this

Great story about the hay.
There are a great many sites (mainly of the "dumb laws" kind; Google "bale of hay" and hackney) that say London taxis/hackneys must carry a bale of hay, but none of them bother to mention the law was repealed. (Assuming it was; now I want to see the law!)

Jackie   Link to this

I believe that the provisions for the bale of hay were actually local by-laws rather than laws set by Parliament, so the provision may have gone in London, but I'm not sure about Manchester - I honestly thought that it was still in place I'll have to check.

Interestingly, many hackney carriage drivers still seem rather amused by (and proud of) the tradition and carry the minature in the glove compartment anyway to show that they're part of the old and honourable profession.

Warren Keith Wright   Link to this

Granted that at this date there was nowhere "safe" to stash one's cash---I suppose if you had it with you, at least you would know you were being robbed---but why hide it at a seamstress's? As a blind, since she was probably not suspected of having much? But then he takes it home again and leaves it, as though he'd just been giving it an airing. Surely it couldn't have been light to carry round---perhaps an exercise substitute!

Paul Miller   Link to this

This link is Hackny coach rates circa 1722.
http://www.londonancestor.com/stow/stow-hack.htm

This link is Waterman rates 1722
http://www.londonancestor.com/stow/stow-water.htm

Nix   Link to this

The "Sempstress" --

Perhaps he had her sew the coins into the lining of his clothing, or some similar form of concealment, for safety.

JonTom Kittredge   Link to this

The “Sempstress”

Good question from Mr. Wright. I don’t really know, but it reads to me like, seeing a disturbance, Mr Pepys is filled with the proverbial pepysian-curiosity. Mrs. Johnson is someone he knows nearby, who also has a good view of the action, so he and his friend run into her house. But he is worried about the cash on him, so he gives it to her to hide temporarily on his way upstairs to the window.

Maybe after having satisfied his curiosity, he decided it would be safe enough to take it home with him (or at least safer than leaving at Mrs. J’s). I don’t know, this is just speculation on my part. Does anyone have a more authoritative interpretation?

David Quidnunc   Link to this

Hackney and Hack

The word "hack" and the adjective "hackneyed" come up more often when describing writers and writing than they do describing taxicabs, at least in America. It's easy to see how the word came to be used for writers (who often can follow well-worn routes). Here's the American Heritage Dictionary definitions:

hackney -- "1. A horse suited for routine riding or driving 2. A coach or carriage for hire ... v. To make banal or trite"

hack -- "1. a Hackney 2. A worn-out horse for hire 3a. A hireling b. A writer hired to produce routine writing 4. informal a. A taxicab. . . ."

David Quidnunc   Link to this

RE: Every Pub in London?

PHE writes: "I'm sure someone has counted up the number of different taverns mentioned in the diaries. If not, maybe someone wants to volunteer!"

Stop counting! My Vol. 11 of the Latham & Matthews edition of the diary (the index volume) just got delivered today (much delayed -- there must have been a run on them for some reason . . .) and I can report that under the word "tavern" there are four solid pages of references (under various headings) -- and L&M warn that these are only London-area taverns, alehouses and eating houses that are named. Unnamed taverns are listed under street names; taverns elsewhere are listed under place names.

By the way, PHE, I only count musical instruments, turkey meals and numbers of times that Pepys doesn't use the title "Mr." with Luellin. I draw the line at taverns. Nice try though . . . ;)

michael f vincent   Link to this

re: Mr?
In my circle of acquaintances "our good buddy" was called by his surname and "Mr" was reserved for respect or a dressing down, only in the USA did I get called by my christian name. It came as a shock to me but I got used to it, but now I don't know if its a friend or enemy or boss talking. No warning 'til words hit. It takes quite a while for tradition to change habits.

chris   Link to this

As it happens, I was at the Watermen's Hall of the Company of Watermen and Lightermen on Monday 3 February. It was an event to present the prizes for the annual Dogget's Coat and Badge race. The winner be-decked in the traditional waterman's garb. I mentioned this site so perhaps others more knowledgeable will add some more notes. They tell me that there were 40000 watermen on the thames in Pepys' day.

Try this link, has pics of the scarlet livery and much more
www.watermenshall.org

McDuck   Link to this

Re: Every Pub

It would have taken a lot of time for Sam to visit every pub in London... In his book "London" Peter Ackroyd writes about 17.000 gin houses in 1750 and 20.000 pubs 1870. I guess in 1660 the number will be a little bit smaller, but still liver crushing :-)

laura   Link to this

NYC taxi drivers have hack licenses.

While it's true that writers are disparagingly called "hacks", in New York City, at least, a license to drive a taxi is often referred to as a "hack license". It seems safe to assume that expression shares a common root with the hackneyed carriages Pepys mentions.

Grahamt   Link to this

Re: Hack licenses
As mentioned above Hackney carriage (not hackneyed, though they are commonplace) is still the official (British) term for a taxi. Apparently it comes from the London borough of Hackney where horses used to be pastured. You won't find much pasture, nor horses, in Hackney nowadays! (Plenty of taxis though)
It is interesting to think that there is a link between NY taxi drivers and the East End of London.

Colin Gravois   Link to this

Sam's always paying the soldiers, as is part of his job to do, but at no set time or place? Could someone tell us where (when?) he gets the money, who "controlled" the payments? Is there a record of his accounts with the gov't paymaster? I presume he received orders to pay, but from whom? Who figured the sums? And these had to be huge amounts, or what? Where did he keep the funds until paytime? Leftovers?

michael f vincent   Link to this

Colin G: Soldiers pay:
there are 5 references to Excise office in sp diary so far.
just around the corner is the Mint and the HM Customs & Excise organisation :
a source:
http://www.hmce.gov.uk/about/ourhistory/tudorst...
part of the time line of tax dollar:
1644 Salt Tax introduced

1660 Tobacco Duty introduced

The excise officers and their duties in an English market town: Kingston Upon Thames 1643-1973
JRP, 1995
History of the collection of Excise duties in Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, from the introduction of beer duty in 1643 to the start of Value Added Tax in 1973.
0952563800

BULLEN, Mark
Curiosities of the Customs in South West England
Privately published, 1994
Regional history of HM Customs & Excise c.1500-1900 and in particular of the custom houses (their premises, furnishings, historical collections of equipment and administrative records) at Avonmouth,

I hope this will help.

dumb blonde   Link to this

Even though these comments are five years old I thought I would inform all those people who are of the opinion that a bale of hay is a statutory requirement in law to be carried in or on all hackney carriages in London, or indeed the UK, that you are not only miserably wrong but you are also a victim of your own failing to "understand fact from fiction".

The moral is, "never put your blind faith in that which cannot be substantiated.

Regards

language hat   Link to this

I appreciate the info, but could you provide a link to a source so we don't have to take your word for it? Thanks!

Montresor   Link to this

Is it possible that this rebellious display by the republican soldiery was directed in protest against the impending trial, in the very same courtroom that once was the Star Chamber's own, of Col. John Jones, for his participation in the execution of Charles I --- a trial that Pepys was to participate in, and in which he was supposed to testify against Jones? No wonder he hid in the attic during these martial demonstrations.

Log in to post an annotation.

If you don't have an account, then register here.