Wikipedia

This text was copied from Wikipedia on 2 December 2021 at 6:02AM.

.mw-parser-output .infobox-subbox{padding:0;border:none;margin:-3px;width:auto;min-width:100%;font-size:100%;clear:none;float:none;background-color:transparent}.mw-parser-output .infobox-3cols-child{margin:auto}
The Lord Guilford
Francis North, 1st Baron Guilford by John Riley lowres color.jpg
Portrait of Francis North, 1st Baron Guilford by John Riley, circa 1682
Lord Keeper of the Great Seal
In office
1682–1685
Preceded byThe Earl of Nottingham
Succeeded byThe Lord Jeffreys
Personal details
Born
Francis North

22 October 1637
Died5 September 1685 (aged 47)
Wroxton Abbey, Oxfordshire
Alma materSt John's College, Cambridge

Francis North, 1st Baron Guilford, PC, KC[1](22 October 1637 – 5 September 1685) was the third son of Dudley North, 4th Baron North, and his wife Anne Montagu, daughter of Sir Charles Montagu of Boughton and Mary Whitmore. He was created Baron Guilford in 1683, after becoming Lord Keeper of the Great Seal in succession to Lord Nottingham.[2]

Biography

Francis North was educated at St John's College, Cambridge[3] and was admitted to the Middle Temple on 27 November 1655. He was Called to the Bar on 28 June 1661.[4] He was an eminent lawyer, Solicitor-General (1671), Attorney-General (1673), and Chief Justice of the Common Pleas (1675), and in 1679 was made a member of the Privy Council Ministry and, on its dissolution, of the Cabinet. He was a man of wide culture and a staunch royalist,[2] although he opposed the absolutist tendencies of Sunderland and Jeffreys, his two bitterest political enemies. He was a strong supporter of the royal prerogative, remarking that he did not see how any honest lawyer could oppose it, as all the precedents were in its favour.[5]

Popish Plot and afterwards

Guilford sat as a judge at some of the Popish Plot trials, and like his colleagues he has been accused of excessive credulity in believing the lies of Titus Oates and the other informers.[6] On the other hand, it has been argued that the senior Chief Justice, Sir William Scroggs, so dominated the proceedings that none of the other judges had any influence on the outcome.[7] If North succumbed to the prevailing hysteria, so did many others: his brother Roger wrote that "it was a time when wise men behaved like stark fools".[8]

When public opinion finally began to turn against the Plot, the Crown moved against its instigators. North presided at the trial of one of the more disreputable of the Plot informers, Stephen College, nicknamed "the Protestant joiner", for high treason, in August 1681, and virtually ordered the jury to convict him. College was duly found guilty and hanged.[9] North's conduct of the trial attracted a great deal of criticism, as the evidence of treason (College was accused of appearing in arms at the Oxford Parliament) was considered by many to be flimsy, and the charge had already been thrown out by a grand jury.[10]

Later years

Guilford was hostile to Lord Jeffreys, and regarded the future Lord Chief Justice, Sir Robert Wright, as utterly unfit for any judicial office; he was well qualified to assess Wright's ability since Wright as a young barrister had been a friend of his and had relied on North to write his legal opinions for him.[11] He has been criticised for remaining in office after Wright was made Chief Justice over his vehement objections, especially as it must have been clear that he no longer had any influence over judicial appointments.[12] On the other hand, he may have felt that keeping Jeffreys out of the Lord Chancellorship was a sufficient justification for clinging to office.

Character

Guilford was generally respected for his integrity, (apart perhaps from his conduct of the trial of Stephen College), but he was sometimes accused of self-importance and a lack of any sense of humour; for example he showed excessive agitation at the ridiculous rumour spread by Sunderland and Jeffreys that he had been seen riding on a rhinoceros.[13] Sunderland hated North with a passion, describing him as the most unfit man who ever held his office: "partial, unreasonable, corrupt, arbitrary and ignorant". There is no reason to believe any of these accusations: certainly no one, other than Sunderland, seems to have thought that Guilford was either corrupt or ignorant. [14]

Death

Guilford died, it seems rather unexpectedly, at his country house, Wroxton Abbey, near Banbury, on 5 September 1685, aged only 47. Although he had apparently been suffering from stress and overwork, the precise reasons for his early death are unclear. His rather cryptic last words were: "It will not do".[15]

Wroxton Abbey, North's country seat

Family

In 1672 he married Lady Frances Pope, daughter and co-heiress of Thomas Pope, 3rd Earl of Downe by his wife Beatrice (Beata) Poole, daughter of Henry Poole. Frances inherited the Wroxton estate. He was succeeded as 2nd baron by his only son Francis (1673–1729).[2]

Works

Like many upper-class Englishmen of his time, North was devoted to music. Less typically for his time and class he had a keen interest in musical theory (as did his brother Roger), and published a book on the subject, A Philosophical essay on musick (1677), which has been praised as "an admirably clear exposition of the physical basis of music".[16] Francis North's musical notations have been described as the earliest known examples of synthetic phonograms.[17]

Notes

.mw-parser-output .reflist{font-size:90%;margin-bottom:0.5em;list-style-type:decimal}.mw-parser-output .reflist .references{font-size:100%;margin-bottom:0;list-style-type:inherit}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-2{column-width:30em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-3{column-width:25em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns{margin-top:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns ol{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-alpha{list-style-type:upper-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-roman{list-style-type:upper-roman}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-alpha{list-style-type:lower-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-greek{list-style-type:lower-greek}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-roman{list-style-type:lower-roman}
  1. ^ Lundy 2011, p. 3023 § 30223 cites Mosley 2003, p. 1691
  2. ^ a b c One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: .mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"\"""\"""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-free a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Lock-green.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:linear-gradient(transparent,transparent),url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg")right 0.1em center/12px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:none;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .citation .mw-selflink{font-weight:inherit}Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Guilford, Barons and Earls of". Encyclopædia Britannica. 12 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 691. This cites:
    • Lives of the Norths by the Hon. R. North, edited by A. Jessopp (1890).
    • E. Foss, The Judges of England, vol. vii. (1848–1864).
  3. ^ "North, Francis (NRT653F)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge.
  4. ^ Williamson, J.B. (1937). The Middle Temple Bench Book. 2nd edition, p.132.
  5. ^ Fraser, Antonia King Charles II Mandarin edition 1993 p. 421
  6. ^ Kenyon 2000, p. 180.
  7. ^ Kenyon 2000, p. 134.
  8. ^ Kenyon 2000, p. xv.
  9. ^ Kenyon 2000, p. 276-7.
  10. ^ Fraser p.421
  11. ^ Milne-Tyte 1989, pp. 82–83.
  12. ^ Milne-Tyte 1989, p. 94.
  13. ^ Milne-Tyte 1989, p. 95.
  14. ^ Kenyon 1992, p. 91.
  15. ^ Milne-Tyte 1989, p. 140.
  16. ^ Latham, Robert and Matthews, Charles ed. Diary of Samuel Pepys (1983) Vol. X Companion p.278
  17. ^ Feaster, Patrick (30 October 2012). Pictures of Sound: One Thousand Years of Educed Audio: 980-1980. 2011 ARSC Conference. Dust-to-Digital. 27m14s. Retrieved 14 August 2018.

References

  • Kenyon, J.P. (1992). Robert Spencer, 2nd Earl of Sunderland (reprint ed.). Longmans Green and Co.
  • Kenyon, J.P. (2000). The Popish Plot (reissue ed.). Phoenix Press.
  • Lundy, Darryl (10 April 2011). "Francis North, 1st Baron of Guilford". The Peerage. p. 3023 § 30223. Endnotes:
    • Mosley, Charles, ed. (2003). Burke's Peerage, Baronetage & Knightage. 2 (107th in 3 volumes ed.). Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.A.: Burke's Peerage. p. 1691.
  • Milne-Tyte, Robert (1989). Bloody Jeffreys- the Hanging Judge. London: André Deutsch.

1 Annotation

San Diego Sarah  •  Link

Francis North was a young but highly-regarded lawyer in 1667, appointed King's Council in 1668, and was one of 22 Fire Court judges, responsible for sorting out the legal entanglements for the rebuilding of London. after the Great Fire of 1666. The Fire Court process lasted 10 years, and the judges -- to their great credit -- refused all fees. Because of their work, London was largely rebuilt in that time. For more info., see
https://www.pepysdiary.com/diary/1666/11/05/#c551… for the Fire Courts, and his Parliamentary bio at
https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/…

Log in to post an annotation.

If you don't have an account, then register here.

References

Chart showing the number of references in each month of the diary’s entries.

1668