Annotations and comments

Nick Hedley has posted 8 annotations/comments since 3 June 2012.

The most recent…


About Thursday 12 March 1662/63

Nick Hedley  •  Link

Good point Sasha. It may also be that Uncle Wight was not left anything in the will because, as a successful fishmonger, he was seen as sufficiently wealthy already and had no need of more money from Robert.

About Monday 10 November 1662

Nick Hedley  •  Link

In addition to the three brothers of Lord Crew already noted, he had five sisters named Anne, Patience, Temperance, Silence and Prudence; the Crews were after all a well-known puritan family, see Barthomley: In Letters From a Former Rector to His Eldest Son (1856) by Edward Hinchliffe.

About Tuesday 3 June 1662

Nick Hedley  •  Link

I am assuming that the £530 is in cash/gold, possibly after deducting his monthly debts. But I understand that he also hold some land in Bampton; does anyone get any sense of whether the capital value of this land is included?

About Wednesday 22 January 1661/62

Nick Hedley  •  Link

"But the House did, in very open terms, say, they were grown too wise to be fooled again into another army; and said they had found how that man that hath the command of an army is not beholden to any body to make him King."

This is the reason, I believe, why the UK has a Royal Navy and a Royal Air Force but no Royal Army to the present day. There are regiments with "Royal" titles, e.g. Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, but not the army as a whole

About Sunday 19 January 1661/62

Nick Hedley  •  Link

"so I fear may do us that are nearer to him [i.e. Sam is nearer than Mrs Norbury] a great deal of wrong, if he [Uncle Wight] should die without children, which I am sorry for".
According to Phil's excellent family tree, Uncle Wight is Sam's father's half brother in that they shared the same father but had different mothers. On the other hand, Mrs Norbury was Uncle Wight's sister-in-law, being the full sister of Aunt Wight. This comment makes sense if "nearness" is measured only through the male line but not if Aunt Wight were also considered. It seems unfair to our modern eyes that Sam should expect that the property in a childless marriage should only go to the husband's side of the family. Or perhaps Sam is referring to the closeness of the social interaction between him and Uncle Wight as compared to Uncle Wight and Mrs Norbury.
Thanks Phil for the updated site (and family tree). It was excellent before but now is even better.

About Thursday 16 February 1659/60

Nick Hedley  •  Link

Thanks for re-starting the diary again Phil and for the ability to post. The summer seemed slightly lacking without the daily fix of Pepys.

About Monday 31 May 1669

Nick Hedley  •  Link

I should also like to thank Phil also for the brilliant original idea of posting daily Pepys blogs and allowing annotations that have without fail been funny, knowledgeable or insightful (and frequently all three). You have really attracted a wonderful group of followers who have been great companions during this stroll through the diary.

Although sad for us that the diary has stopped, it is perhaps for the best that he has bowed out at the top of his game, wielding substantial influence, with money in the bank (or in the strong room), with good friends to dine and be merry with and most of all with Elizabeth still with him. I personally would have loved to hear of his time as president of the Royal Society but alas that is not to be.

I shall now take a break (mourning) and start again in January since there is something particularly satisfying with knowing what Samuel was doing on this day 343 years ago or 353 years ago when I start again. I hope that Phil’s much deserved break will allow him to contemplate what a great and good thing he has constructed and I further hope that he can be persuaded to allow further annotations since they will surely be even more funny, knowledgeable and insightful for having passed that way before.