Wikipedia

This text was copied from Wikipedia on 15 June 2018 at 6:01AM.

Henry Cromwell
Henry Cromwell.jpg
Lord Deputy of Ireland
Personal details
Born (1628-01-20)20 January 1628
Huntingdon
Died 23 March 1674(1674-03-23) (aged 46)
Wicken, Cambridgeshire
Spouse(s) Elizabeth Russell
Children 7
Parents Oliver Cromwell
Elizabeth Bourchier
Profession Politician, soldier

Henry Cromwell (20 January 1628 – 23 March 1674) was the fourth son of Oliver Cromwell and Elizabeth Bourchier, and an important figure in the Parliamentarian regime in Ireland.

Biography

Henry Cromwell, fourth son of Oliver Cromwell, was born at Huntingdon on 20 January 1628.[1] He was educated at Felsted School and Emmanuel College, Cambridge.[2] Henry Cromwell entered the New Model Army towards the close of the First Civil War, and was in 1647 either a captain in Harrison's regiment or the commander of Fairfax's lifeguard.[3] Heath and Wood identify him with the commandant of the life-guard.[4] In the summer of 1648 Henry Cromwell appears to have been serving under his father in the north of England.[5]

In February 1650 Cromwell had attained the rank of colonel, and followed his father to Ireland with reinforcements. He and Lord Broghill defeated Lord Inchiquin near Limerick in April 1650.[6] In 1653 Cromwell was nominated one of the representatives of Ireland in the Barebones Parliament.[7] On 22 February 1654 Henry Cromwell was enrolled in Gray's Inn (this was merely an honorary registration).[8]

After the dissolution of that parliament and the establishment of the Protectorate, his father despatched him to Ireland on a mission of inquiry to discover the feelings of the Irish officers towards the new government, and to counteract the influence of the Anabaptists.[9] He reported that the army in general, with the exception of the Anabaptists, were well satisfied with the recent change, and recommended that Ludlow, of whose venomous discontent and reproachful utterances he complains, should be replaced as lieutenant-general by John Desborough. Charles Fleetwood, though a staunch supporter of the protectorate, he regarded as too deeply involved with the anabaptist party to be safely continued in Ireland, and advised his recall to England after a time, and the appointment of Desborough to act as his deputy.[10] Before leaving Ireland he held a discussion with Ludlow on the lawfulness of the protectorate, which the latter has recorded at length in his Memoirs.[11]

In August 1654 a new Irish council was commissioned, and the council of state voted that Cromwell should be appointed commander of the Irish army and a member of the new council.[12] This appointment seems to have been made at the request of Lord Broghill and other Irish gentlemen.[13] In spite of this pressure it was not till 25 December 1654 that Cromwell became a member of the Irish council, though the date of his commission as major-general of the forces in Ireland was 24 Aug. 1654.[14] The cause of this delay was probably Cromwell's reluctance to advance his sons (see Carlyle, Cromwell, Letter cxcix.) Whatever the Protector's intentions may have been, and there are several references in the letters of John Thurloe and Henry Cromwell which prove that this reluctance was real, Fleetwood was re-called to England very soon after the coming of Henry Cromwell to Ireland. He landed in Ireland in July 1655, and Fleetwood left in September.[15] The latter still retained his title of lord-lieutenant, so that Cromwell was merely his deputy — the position which he had intended Desborough to fill. The object of the change in the government of Ireland was to substitute a settled civil government for the rule of a clique of officers, and to put an end to the influence of the Anabaptists, who had hitherto monopolised the direction of the government. The policy of Cromwell towards the native Irish was very little milder than that of his predecessor. His earliest letters show him zealously engaged in shipping young women and boys to populate Jamaica. He suggested to Thurloe the exportation of fifteen hundred or two thousand young boys of twelve or fourteen years of age.[16] He does not seem to have sought to mitigate the rigour of the transplantation, or to have considered it either unjust or impolitic. On the other hand his religious views were more liberal, and he remonstrated against the oath of abjuration imposed on the Irish Catholics in 1657.[17]

What distinguished Cromwell's administration from that of Fleetwood was the different policy adopted by him towards the English colony in Ireland. Instead of conducting the government in the interests of the soldiery, and in accordance with their views, he consulted the interests of the old settlers, the ancient protestant inhabitants of Ireland, and was repaid by their confidence and admiration. A letter addressed to the Protector by Vincent Gookin, at a time when there was some danger of Cromwell's resignation or removal, shows the feelings with which this party regarded his rule.[18]

The Presbyterians and the more moderate sects of Independents, hitherto oppressed by the predominance enjoyed by the anabaptists, expressed a like satisfaction with his government.[19] With the anabaptist leaders Cromwell had, in January 1656, an interview, in which he very plainly stated his intentions towards them. "I told them plainly that they might expect equal liberty in their spiritual and civil concernments with any others; and ... that I held myself obliged in duty to protect them from being imposed upon by any; as also to keep them from doing the like to others. Liberty and countenance they might expect from me, but to rule me, or to rule with me, I should not approve of".[20] This line of conduct he faithfully followed in spite of many provocations. His adversaries were powerful in England, and continually at the ear of the Protector; but Oliver, though chary of praise, and not giving his son all the public support he expected, approved of his conduct in this matter. At the same time he warned him against being "over jealous", and "making it a business to be too hard" for those who contested with him.[21]

C.H. Firth states in the Dictionary of National Biography that in truth Henry’s great weakness lay in the fact that he was too sensitive and irritable. His letters are a long series of complaints, and he continually talks of resigning his office.[22] One of the first of his troubles was the mutinous condition of Ludlow's regiment, which he took the precaution of disbanding as soon as possible.[23] Then, without Cromwell’s knowledge, petitions were got up by his partisans for his appointment to Fleetwood's post, which afforded Hewson and other anabaptists the opportunity of public protests on behalf of their old commander, in which they identified the deputy’s supporters with the enemies of the godly interest.[24] In November 1656 two generals and a couple of colonels simultaneously threw up their commissions on account of their dissatisfaction with Henry’s policy.[25]

Just as Cromwell was congratulating himself that the opposition of the anabaptists was finally crushed, he was involved in fresh perplexities by the intrigues and resignation of Steele, the Irish Chancellor.[26] After the second foundation of the protectorate by the "Petition and Advice", Cromwell was at length appointed Lord-Lieutenant by commission dated 16 November 1657.[27] His new ran gave him more dignity and more responsibility, but did not increase his power or put an end to his difficulties. His promotion was accompanied by the appointment of a new Irish council, "the major art of whom", wrote Henry to his brother Richard, "were men of a professed spirit of contradiction to whatsoever I would have, and took counsel together how to lay wait for me without a cause".[28] His popularity was shown by a vote of parliament on 8 June 1657, settling upon him lands to the value of £1,500 a year, which he refused on the ground of the poverty of Ireland and the indebtedness of England.[29]

At the time of Cromwell's appointment the pay of the Irish army was eight months in arrears, and £180,000, owing from the English exchequer, was necessary to clear the engagements of the Irish government.[30] The difficulty of obtaining this money, as also the appointment of the hostile councillors, he attributed to his adversaries in the Protector's council. "Those who were against my coming to this employment, by keeping back our monies have an after game to play, for it is impossible for me to continue in this place upon so huge disadvantages".[31] He was also charged to disband a large part of the Irish army, but not allowed to have a voice in the management of disbanding.[22]

Cromwell endeavoured to devise means of raising the money to pay them in Ireland, but found the country was too poor, and the taxes far heavier than in England.[32] By using the utmost economy he wrote that £196,000 might suffice for the present, but all he seems to have obtained was the promise of £30,000.[33] In the opinion of Firth, to have succeeded under such unfavourable circumstances in maintaining tranquillity and apparent contentment is no small proof of Cromwell’s ability as a ruler. "The hypocrisy of men may be deep", he wrote in April 1658, "but really any indifferent spectator would gather, from the seeming unanimity and affection of the people of Ireland, that his highness’s interest is irresistible here".[34] The adversaries who rendered the task of governing Ireland so burdensome appear to have been the leaders of the military party who surrounded the Protector. Henry Cromwell frequently refers to them in terms of dislike and distrust, especially in his letters to Thurloe during 1657 and 1658. He considered them as opposed to any legal settlement and desirous to perpetuate their own arbitrary power.[35]

On the question of the acceptance of the crown offered to his father in 1657 his own views were almost exactly the same as those of the Protector himself. From the first Henry held the constitution sketched in the articles of the Petition and Advice to be "a most excellent structure", and was taken by the prospect of obtaining a parliamentary basis for the protectorate. But the title of king, "a gaudy feather in the hat of authority", he held a thing of too slight importance to be the subject of earnest contention. Both directly and through Thurloe he urged his father to refuse the title, but to endeavour to obtain the new constitutional settlement offered him by parliament with it.[36]

The sudden dissolution of the Second Protectorate Parliament in February 1658 was a great blow to Cromwell's hopes of settlement, and he expressed his fears lest the Protector should be induced again to resort to non-legal or extra-legal ways of raising money. Now John Lambert was removed, the odium of such things would fall nearer his highness. Errors in raising money were the most compendious ways to cause a general discontent.[37] He advised the calling of a new parliament as soon as possible, but it should be preceded by the remodelling of the army and the cashiering of turbulent officers.[38] He opposed the proposal to tax the cavalier party promiscuously, but approved the imposition of a test on all members of the approaching parliament.[39]

Cromwell's great aim was to found the protectorate on as broad a basis as possible, to free it from the control of the military leaders, and to rally to its support as many of the royalists and old parliamentarians as possible. He knew that the maintenance of the existing state of affairs depended solely on the life of the Protector. The news of his father's illness and the uncertainty as to his successor redoubled Cromwell's fears. The announcement that the Protector had before dying nominated Richard Cromwell was very welcome to Henry. "I was relieved by it", he wrote to Richard, "not only upon the public consideration, but even upon the account of the goodness of God to our poor family, who hath preserved us from the contempt of the enemy".[40]

There is no sign that Cromwell ever sought or desired the succession himself. As the Protector’s death had determined his existing commission as lord deputy, he now received a new one, but with the higher title of Lieutenant and Governor-General.[41] It was with great reluctance that Cromwell was persuaded to accept the renewal of his commission. He was anxious to come over to England, not only for the benefit of his own health, but (after he had agreed to continue in the government of Ireland) in order to confer with Richard and his friends in England on the principles of Irish policy, and on the prospects and plans of the new government in England.[42] But both Thurloe and Lord Broghill strongly urged him not to come. The former wrote that his continuance in Ireland, and at the head of so good an army, was one of the greatest safeguards of his brother’s rule in England, and Broghill added, "Neither Ireland nor Harry Cromwell are safe if separated".[43] At Dublin, therefore, he remained watching with anxiety the gathering of the storm in England, and hoping that parliament would bring some remedy to the distempers of the army.[44]

The meetings of the officers in London and the manifesto published by them roused him to vehement expostulation on 20 October 1658 with Fleetwood, whom they had petitioned the Protector to appoint commander-in-chief. He was wroth at the slight to his brother, but still more at the aspersions cast on his father’s memory, and, above all things, distressed by the prospect of renewed civil war.[45] For the next few months Cromwell’s letters are unusually few and short, caused in part by his attacks of illness, in part by the tact that he knew his letters were not secure.[46]

Cromwell's numerous correspondents in England kept him well informed of the progress of events there, but he bitterly complains that for some time before the dissolution of the Third Protectorate Parliament he had received no letters from the Protector. In answer to the letter of the English army leaders which announced the fall of his brother’s government, he sent an ambiguous reply assuring them of the peaceable disposition of the Irish army, and commissioning three officers to represent their views in England.[47] It is plain that he regarded his brother still as the legitimate governor, and was prepared to act for his restoration if so commanded.

During this period of suspense the hopes of the Royalists (Cavaliers) rose high, and more than one overture was made to Henry on behalf of Charles II. Lord Falconbridge and possibly Lord Broghill seem to have been the agents employed in this negotiation.[48] But nothing was more opposed to the views of Henry than to promote the restoration of the Stuarts. "My opinion", he wrote on 21 March 1659, "is that any extreme is more tolerable than returning to Charles Stuart. Other disasters are temporary and may be mended; those not".[49]

The principles Cromwell had expressed in his reproof to Fleetwood forbade him to use his army for personal ends, or seek to impose its will on the nation. Accordingly, after vainly awaiting the expected instructions from Richard, and receiving from others credible notice of his brother's acquiescence in the late revolution, Henry on 15 June forwarded his own submission to the new government.[50] Before receiving this letter parliament (the restored Rump on 7 June had ordered him to deliver up the government of Ireland and return to England. Obeying their orders he reached England about the end of June, gave an account of his conduct there to the council of state on 6 July, and then retired to Cambridgeshire.[51]

For or the remainder of his life Cromwell lived in obscurity. He lost, in consequence of the Restoration, lands in England to the value of £2,000 a year, probably his share of the forfeited estates which had been conferred on his father.[52] With the pay he had received during his service in Ireland he had purchased an estate worth between six and seven hundred a year,[53] which he succeeded in retaining.[54]

In his petition to Charles II for that object, Cromwell urged that his actions had been dictated by natural duty to his father, not by any malice against the king. He pleaded the merits of his government of Ireland, and the favour he had shown the Royalists during the time of his power.[55]Clarendon, Ormonde, and many other royalists exerted their influence in his favour.[56] Accordingly the lands of Cromwell in Meuth and Connaught were confirmed to his trustees by a special proviso of the Act of Settlement;[57] but his family seems to have lost them in the next generation. They are said to have been illegally dispossessed by some of the Clanrickarde family, the ancient owners of the land bought by Henry Cromwell's arrears.[58] During the latter years of his life Cromwell resided at Spinney Abbey in Wicken, Cambridgeshire, which he purchased in 1661.[59][60]

King Charles II seems to have been satisfied of Cromwell's peaceableness, for though more than once denounced by informers, he was never disquieted on that account. Noble collects several anecdotes of doubtful authority concerning the relations of Charles II and Cromwell. He died on 23 March 1674 (O.S.) in the forty-seventh year of his age, and was buried at Wicken Church in Cambridgeshire.[54]

Family

On 10 May 1653 Cromwell married Elizabeth (died 7 April 1687), daughter of Sir Francis Russell.[61][54] They had five sons and two daughters, the history of whose descendants is elaborately traced by Noble and Waylen.[62] His second son, Henry Cromwell, married Hannah Hewling, sister of the two Hewlings executed in 1686 for their share in Monmouth's rebellion, and died in 1711, a major in Fielding's regiment.[63]

Ancestry

Notes

  1. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Noble, i. 197.
  2. ^ ACAD & CRML644H.
  3. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Cromwelliana, p. 36.
  4. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Flagellum, p. 57; Wood, Fasti, 1649.
  5. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Memoirs of Captain Hodgson, p. 31, ed. Turner.
  6. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Whitelocke, Memorials, f. 432; Cromwelliana, p. 75.
  7. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Parliamentary History, xx. 1/9.
  8. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152.
  9. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites March 1654, Thurloe, ii. 162.
  10. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites March 1654, Thurloe, ii. 1 49.
  11. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Ludlow Memoirs, p. 187, ed. 1751.
  12. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites 21-22 August 1654, Cal. State Papers, Dom. pp. 321-328.
  13. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites 21-22 August 1654, Cal. State Papers, Dom. p. 382; Thurloe, iii. 29.
  14. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Oliver Cromwell, Life of Oliver Cromwell, p. 693; 14th Rep, of the Deputy-Keeper of Irish Records, p. 28.
  15. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Mercurius Politicus, 5494, 5620.
  16. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Thurloe, iv. 23, 40.
  17. ^ Firth 1888, p. 152 cites Thurloe, vi. 527.
  18. ^ Firth 1888, pp. 152-153 cites Thurloe, v. 646.
  19. ^ Firth 1888, pp. 152-153 cites Nichols, Letters to O. Cromwell, 137; Thurloe, iv. 286).
  20. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Thurloe, iv. 433.
  21. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Carlyle, Cromwell, Letters cvii. cviii.
  22. ^ a b Firth 1888, p. 153.
  23. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Thurloe, iii. 715, iv. 74.
  24. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Thurloe, iv. 276, 348.
  25. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Thurloe, v. 670.
  26. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Thurloe, vii. 199.
  27. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites 14th Rep. of Deputy-Keeper of Irish Records, p. 29; Thurloe, vi. 446, 632.
  28. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Thurloe, vii. 400.
  29. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Burton, Diary, ii. 197-224.
  30. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Burton, vi. 649, 657.
  31. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Burton, vi. 651, 665.
  32. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Burton, vi. 684, vii. 72.
  33. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Burton, vi. 683, vii. 100.
  34. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Burton, vii. 101.
  35. ^ Firth 1888, p. 153 cites Burton, vi. 93.
  36. ^ Firth 1888, pp. 153–154 cites Burton, vi. 93, 182, 222.
  37. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Burton, vi. 820.
  38. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Burton, vi. 820, 857.
  39. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Burton, vii. 218.
  40. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Burton, vii. 400.
  41. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites 6 November 1658, 14th Rep. of Deputy-Keeper of Irish Records, p. 28.
  42. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Thurloe, vii. 400, 423, 453.
  43. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Thurloe, ib. vii. 510, 528.
  44. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Thurloe, vii. 453.
  45. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Thurloe, vii. 455.
  46. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Thurloe, vii. 665.
  47. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Thurloe, vii. 674, 23 May 1659.
  48. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Clarendon State Papers, iii. 500, 589; Thurloe, vii. 686.
  49. ^ Firth 1888, p. 154 cites Thurloe, vii. 635.
  50. ^ Firth 1888, pp. 154–155 cites Thurloe, vii. 684.
  51. ^ Firth 1888, p. 155 cites Mercurius Politicus, 1659. pp. 560, 576, 583.
  52. ^ Firth 1888, p. 155 cites Calendar of State Papers, Dom. 1660, p. 519.
  53. ^ Firth 1888, p. 155 cites Thurloe, vi. 773, vii. 15.
  54. ^ a b c Firth 1888, p. 155.
  55. ^ Firth 1888, p. 155 cites Calendar of State Papers, Dom. 1660, p. 519.
  56. ^ Firth 1888, p. 155 cites Oliver Cromwell, Memoirs of Oliver Cromwell, p. 718; Thurloe, i.763; Prendergast, Cromwellian Settlement of Ireland, p. 137, 2nd ed.
  57. ^ Firth 1888, p. 155 cites Collection of all the Statutes now in use in the Kingdom of Ireland, 1678, p. 588.
  58. ^ Firth 1888, p. 155 cites Oliver Cromwell, Memoirs of Oliver Cromwell, p. 725.
  59. ^ Chisholm 1911, p. 487.
  60. ^ Firth 1888, p. 155 cites Oliver Cromwell, Memoirs of Oliver Cromwell, p. 725.
  61. ^ Chisholm 1911, p. 486.
  62. ^ Firth 1888, p. 155 cites Noble, i. 218, ii. 403.
  63. ^ Firth 1888, p. 155 cites Waylen, p. 33.

References

Attribution

  •  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainFirth, C.H. (1888). "Cromwell, Henry". In Stephen, Leslie. Dictionary of National Biography. 13. London: Smith, Elder & Co. pp. 152–155.  Endnotes:
    • Noble's Memoirs of the Protectoral House of Cromwell, 1787;
    • Waylen's House of Cromwell and Story of Dunkirk;
    • Thurloe State Papers (to this collection William Cromwell, the grandson of Henry Cromwell, contributed a great number of his grandfather's letters);
    • Oliver Cromwell's Memoirs of the Protector, Oliver Cromwell, and his sons Richard and Henry, 1820;
    • Cal. State Papers Dom.;
    • Cromwelliana;
    • Ludlow's Memoirs, ed. 1751;
    • Parliamentary, or Constitutional History of England, 1751–1762;
    • Nickolls's Original Letters addressed to Oliver Cromwell, 1741;
    • Carlyle's Life of Cromwell.

Further reading

  • Cunningham, John (2011). Conquest and Land in Ireland: The Transplantation to Connacht, 1649-1680. Boydell Press. 


Political offices
Preceded by
Charles Fleetwood
Lord Deputy of Ireland
1657–1659
Succeeded by
Edmund Ludlow
Academic offices
Preceded by
The Marquess of Ormonde
Chancellor of the University of Dublin
1653–1660
Succeeded by
The Duke of Ormonde

1893 text

Colonel Williams —”Cromwell that was”— appears to have been Henry Cromwell, grandson of Sir Oliver Cromwell, and first cousin, once removed, to the Protector. He was seated at Bodsey House, in the parish of Ramsey, which had been his father’s residence, and held the commission of a colonel. He served in several Parliaments for Huntingdonshire, voting, in 1660, for the restoration of the monarchy; and as he knew the name of Cromwell would not be grateful to the Court, he disused it, and assumed that of Williams, which had belonged to his ancestors; and he is so styled in a list of knights of the proposed Order of the Royal Oak. He died at Huntingdon, 3rd August, 1673. (Abridged from Noble’s “Memoirs of the Cromwells,” vol. i., p. 70.)—B.


This text comes from a footnote on a diary entry in the 1893 edition edited by Henry B. Wheatley.

2 Annotations

Pedro  •  Link

Henry Cromwell.

(Antonia Fraser…King Charles II)

“It was a measure of the King’s forgiveness that by a decade after the Restoration he was accepting hospitality from Henry Cromwell, second son of the late Protector, at his home in Newmarket.”

(and speaking on the rights of succession)…

“Presence often constituted right in doubtful succession, as the weak Richard Cromwell gained over his stronger brother Henry, at the time of Oliver’s death, simply as Henry was absent in Ireland.”

Bill  •  Link

Pedro thinks that the Henry Cromwell referred to on 22 March 1663 was the Protector's son and not his grandson as mentioned in the 1893 text. Might be, as both men were colonels, though this Henry became a major-general and governor-general.

CROMWELL, HENRY (1628-1674), son of Oliver Cromwell; entered the parliamentary army; colonel, 1650; defeated Lord Inchiquin near Limerick, 1650; entered at Gray's Inn, 1654; represented Ireland in the Barebones parliament, 1653; sent to Ireland to counteract the influence of the anabaptists; major-general of the forces in Ireland, and member of the Irish council, 1654; remonstrated against the oath of abjuration imposed upon Irish catholics in 1657, but did not mitigate the rigour of the transplantation; lord-deputy, 1657; attempted to relieve the financial difficulties of the Irish administration, but was thwarted from home; urged his father to refuse the title of king, 1657; advised the remodelling of the army, 1658; governor-general of Ireland, 1658; unsuccessfully solicited by partisans of Prince Charles, 1659; returned to England and went into retirement, 1659; lost his lands at the Restoration, but subsequently had his possessions in Meath and Connaught confirmed to his trustees in compensation.
---Dictionary of National Biography: Index and Epitome. S. Lee, 1906.

Log in to post an annotation.

If you don't have an account, then register here.

References

Chart showing the number of references in each month of the diary’s entries.

1663