In-depth articles

has written these in-depth articles:


Annotations and comments

has posted 765 annotations/comments since 27 December 2002.

Comments

About Salisbury Court

Phil  •  Link

Pepys either mis-spelt the name, or it was spelt this way in his time. Today it is "Salisbury Court."

About Problem with the LiveJournal feed

Phil  •  Link

Hmm, that could be it -- occasionally I add extra links into entries after they've been posted. Seems like LJ can't cope with such things unfortunately.

About Elizabeth Pepys (wife, b. St Michel)

Phil  •  Link

She was born in 1640 with the surname of St. Michel. Latham & Matthews state that "by December 1655 [Samuel] Pepys had married [her,] the fifteen-year-old daughter of a penniless Hugeuenot exile," adding "This is the date of the civil ceremony. It seems likely that a religious ceremony had taken place in the previous October." (p.xxii)

About Friday 6 January 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

I recently read Henry Mayhew's excellent 'London Labour and the London Poor,' and while it was written 200 years or so after Pepys' time it shows that even then streets were far from what we expect today. Even main thoroughfares were muddy and dirty enough that many people earned a (very minimal) living by sweeping crossings from one pavement/sidewalk to another for the better off (and better dressed). So I dread to think what they were like in Pepys' time.

About Saturday 7 January 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

The last time I went past the Anchor pub (a few months back) it looked like it had been completely gutted and was being renovated. The rest of the area around Clink Street and Borough Market has been vastly changed over the last few years by new restaurants, bars, etc and while it's still a lovely area, it's now a little bit harder to imagine how it might have been in Pepys' day.

About Axe Yard

Phil  •  Link

I've altered the location on the map link slightly so it now correctly points to the old location of Axe Yard/Fludyer Street, rather than Downing Street.

About Saturday 7 January 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

When Pepys says "my Lord" in this entry (and others) I'm assuming he means Montagu. However, part of me wonders whether he might be referring to Lambert -- would Pepys write a letter to Montagu just before "putting in" at his lodgings?

About Axe Yard

Phil  •  Link

The Axe Yard footnote is tagged 'B', which signifies it was written by Lord Braybrooke, who produced editions of Pepys' Diary in earlier parts of the 19th century, so I assume Fludyer St still existed when he wrote this footnote. The Diary Introduction page was written by Wheatley in 1893. The map link indicates the modern equivalent location of Axe Yard, now Downing St, which hopefully makes things a little clearer.

Thanks for the comments 'language hat'.

About Wednesday 4 January 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

True and it's fine to use that. But that doesn't stop UKP being "a fairly common online notation," and one I come across at least as often as GBP.

About Friday 6 January 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

I can't speak for everyone in the UK, but as far as I know Twelfth Night is no longer celebrated here. The only time I've ever heard it referred to in practice is the date by which Christmas decorations should be taken down; if your tree and/or decorations are still on display by twelfth night it's bad luck! However, it could well be that those more religious than myself do mark the occasion in some other way.

About Sunday 1 January 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

Yes, there are differences between the text on this site and that of the 19070s Latham & Matthews edition (which I assume you looked at). As the http://www.pepysdiary.com/about/ explains, the text on this site comes from the 1893 edition of the diary, which is far from perfect. Latham & Matthews go into some detail about the problems with it. Any problems are not strictly to do with the "online text", but the "1893 text."

Should errors in the 1893 text be corrected before being put online? The only way they could really be corrected is by reference to Pepys' original shorthand -- Latham & Matthews is just another interpretation (albeit far more comprehensive) rather than the One True Text. If I were to correct errors in the 1893 text before posting it online I would have to decide where to draw the line. Do I just add in missing words? Do I correct punctuation? Do I correct obvious spelling errors? Do I research anything that looks like it *might* be a spelling error? Any line drawn would be arbitrary and would create yet another version of the text which, due to lack of time and resources, would not be an entirely satisfactory one.

Therefore I have taken the decision to present the 1893 text exactly as it is on Project Gutenberg, with no alterations other than separating out the footnotes. This makes it clear where the source, and any errors, comes from. Any corrections, clarifications or amendments should be made in the annotations, something everyone is making a wonderful job of! So thank you!

About Thursday 5 January 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

I've read before that the slower flow of the Thames was one of the reasons it used to freeze. I heard then that the cause was because the old London Bridge (and maybe others?) had a smaller amount of space for the water to flow through - it had many supports/piers and smaller gaps between them, thus slowing the river down.

The old London Bridge is a fascinating construction:
http://midtown.net/dragonwing/col9802.htm

About Wednesday 4 January 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

Although, because it's a less common character, Movable Type doesn't seem to automatically encode the character into its HTML entity - "& pound;" (without the space) This means the character may not show up at all on some web browsers. "UKP" is a fairly common online notation for pounds, eg UKP10. Or just use 'pounds'!