Phil Gyford

Articles

Phil Gyford has written four articles:

Annotations and comments

Phil Gyford has posted 771 annotations/comments since 27 December 2002.

Comments

First Reading

About More Pepys Diary press

Phil  •  Link

Thanks for the summary LH! I hope it sounded OK; by the end I was getting tired of the sound of my own voice!

About More background reading pages?

Phil  •  Link

Thanks Kevin. I've been getting more concerned that many people are missing the annotations if they only ever visit the front page of the site. I guess I should either make the bit that says something like "Annotations (23)" more obvious, or have the front page contain only the current diary entry and all its annotations (with a link to the previous entry). Any thoughts?

At the moment I envisage the background pages living in the "Background reading" section (see the tabs at the top of the page), and each bottom-level page would probably just be a lot of annotations on the subject at hand. I fear anything more than this would be unmanageable from my point of view.

About New Recent Annotations page format

Phil  •  Link

I'm glad you like the site.

I'm not entirely sure what you mean about recent annotations... the Recent Annotations list shows the entries that have the most recent annotations, and a snippet of the most recent annotation from each entry. Each entry only appears once in the list.

I'm not sure what link you mean when you say you get nothing by clicking "on link". There are lots of links on the site!

By the way, if you post comments or annotations in future, could you not do it all in capitals - it would make things easier on the eye!

About Anne Mountagu

Phil  •  Link

There is a discrepancy between the 1893 text and Latham & Matthews... the former identifies "Mrs Ann" as being Ann Montagu on 18 Jan 1659/60, while the latter says this is in fact Mrs Jem's maid. L&M sounds the most likely interpretation so I've removed the links from 18, 23, 31 January and 1, 3, 4 February 1659/60 to this page when Mrs Ann is mentioned.

About Thursday 2 February 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

Half way down this page http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/524… it says "Pity the poor taxi driver who, until 1976,. could be commanded by a policeman to reveal his or her bale of hay. If they did not have one in the boot [trunk], then they were clearly ill-treating their horse."

This would presumably be the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976, which I can't find online. (Thanks Nick!)

About Thursday 2 February 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

Can you point us at any of the manufacturers of these miniature bales of hay Jackie? I'm less than convinced.

There may well have been a law along these lines at some time, but I reckon it's since been repealed (although maybe not until fairly recently).

About What to do about plot spoilers...

Phil  •  Link

Thanks for the interesting discussion everyone! You sound perfectly on-course Todd.

Basically, I think everyone should bear in mind that many people are treating this as a day-by-day experience and don't wish to know what's going to happen next in the diary. This becomes a bit less important when relating the future events of minor characters that don't impact on Pepys himself.

Use common sense: only mention something that's going to happen to Pepys in the future if it's essential to a point you're making, and if you do so, preface it with a spoiler warning. Don't spoil things for others.

There will always be grey areas and some people, especially those who haven't read this, are bound to post spoilers at some point over the coming years; if so, a gentle reminder of the policy will set them straight.

I hope that makes sense.

About Aldgate

Phil  •  Link

The most eastern of London's gates and the road of the same name lead into the county of Essex.

About London Bridge

Phil  •  Link

In Pepys' day this was the only bridge across the Thames below Kingston, some miles to the west. The structure then consisted of "19 arches and a wooden drawbridge built 1176-1209 in place of an earlier wooden bridge ... The road across it carried a line of houses on each side with shops at the road level." (Latham and Matthews, Companion).

In 1831 it was replaced with a new bridge 180 feet upstream, and this was later replaced in 1973.

About Somerset House

Phil  •  Link

The building of Pepys' time was replaced by the current building in 1776-86, "desgined, mostly for Government offices, by Sir William Chambers." (Latham & Matthews, Companion)

About Harper's

Phil  •  Link

A tavern just outside the gate of Whitehall Palace on King Street, now Whitehall.

About More footnote pages?

Phil  •  Link

I'm afraid that's not possible Todd - the list is pre-generated by Movable Type, the tool that handles all the entries and comments. I can make it longer though if people feel it would be more useful.

Movable Type isn't really geared towards handling so many comments, so I'm always looking for new ways to make it easier for everyone to use...

About More footnote pages?

Phil  •  Link

I do plan to create some general background pages soon -- I'll be asking for comments on those before long, so hold your horses! :)

But even then I think the best place to ask about individual phrases is on each entry as the answers are more use there than on a page somewhere else. We're bound to repeat ourselves several times over the next few years, however things are arranged.

About Friday 27 January 1659/60

Phil  •  Link

the Crown in the Palace

I've just checked up in Latham & Matthews, and they suggest "Palace" is in fact New Palace Yard. I've changed the link on that word so it points to a page for this, rather than Whitehall Palace, which I'm sure was incorrect. Sorry about the mix up!

As for the Crown... Latham & Mathews say there was a tavern of this name on the west side of King Street, which itself finishes to the western side of New Palace Yard, so I guess this is the place Pepys means.

About New Palace Yard

Phil  •  Link

New Palace Yard was immediately to the north of Westminster Hall: http://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclo…

Old Palace Yard was to the south of the Hall. Latham & Matthews assume that when Pepys was ambiguous and referred to merely "Palace Yard" or "Palace," he's referring to New Palace Yard.