Skip navigation

If you would like to write a summary for this topic, email phil [at] gyford [dot] com

Wikipedia

The Royal Society of London for the Improvement of Natural Knowledge, known simply as The Royal Society, is a learned society for science that was founded in 1660 and claims to be the oldest such society still in existence. Although a voluntary body, it serves as the academy of sciences of the United Kingdom (in which role it receives £40 million annually from the UK Government).[citation needed] The Royal Society is a member organization of the Science Council.

The Royal Society of Edinburgh (founded 1783) is a separate Scottish body. The Royal Irish Academy (founded 1785) is a separate Irish body.

[edit] History

The Royal Society was founded in 1660, only a few months after the Restoration of King Charles II, by members of one or two either secretive or informal societies already in existence. The Royal Society enjoyed the confidence and official support of the restored monarchy. The "New" or "Experimental" form of philosophy was generally ill-regarded by the Aristotelian (and religious) academies, but had been promoted by Sir Francis Bacon in his book The New Atlantis.

Robert Boyle refers to the "Invisible College" as early as 1646. A founding meeting was held at the premises of Gresham College in Bishopsgate on 28 November 1660, immediately after a lecture by Sir Christopher Wren, who was at that time Gresham Professor of Astronomy. At a second meeting a week later, Sir Robert Moray, an influential Freemason who had helped organise the public emergence of the group, reported that the King approved of the meetings. The Royal Society continued to meet at the premises of Gresham College and at Arundel House, the London home of the Dukes of Norfolk, until it moved to its own premises in Crane Court in 1710. [1]

A formal Royal Charter of incorporation passed the Great Seal on 15 July 1662, creating "The Royal Society of London", with Lord Brouncker as the first President, and Robert Hooke was appointed as Curator of Experiments in November 1662. A second Royal Charter was sealed on 23 April 1663, naming the King as Founder and changing the name to "The Royal Society of London for the Improvement of Natural Knowledge".

The motto of the Royal Society, "Nullius in Verba" (Latin: "On the words of no one", although the Royal Society itself now prefers the translation "Nothing in words"[2], and its erstwhile president Robert May favours "Respect the facts"[3]), signifies the Society's commitment to establishing the truth of scientific matters through experiment rather than through citation of authority. Although this seems obvious today, the philosophical basis of the Royal Society differed from previous philosophies such as Scholasticism, which established scientific truth based on deductive logic, concordance with divine providence and the citation of such ancient authorities as Aristotle.

[edit] Historical philosophy and significance

The Royal Society imagined a network across the globe as a public enterprise, an "Empire of Learning", and strove to remove language barriers within the sciences. The Royal Society was dedicated to the free flow of information and encouraged communication. Boyle, in particular, began the practice of reporting his experiments in great detail so that others could replicate them, unlike previous alchemists. Sir Isaac Newton was a practising alchemist and his assistant, J. T. Desaguliers, a demonstrator for the Royal Society, was a prominent Freemason and Grand Master of the Premier Grand Lodge of England. During the eighteenth century, masonic lodges in France became conduits for circulating scientific texts which could not be made available publicly (see John Toland). While the proceedings of the Royal Society reported for instance Chinese alchemists' immortality potions as fact, the Royal Society did actually put the superstitions then current to rigorous testing, for instance placing a spider on a table and sprinkling a circle of salt around it; on the theory that it could not walk across the salt. The spider promptly left the circle, thus disproving that myth.

[edit] Reform

In 1821 Humphry Davy became president and marked a shift in membership towards practising scientists, rather than gentlemen and amateurs. The Industrial Revolution and the needs of business had alerted society to the demand for a professional body for leading scientists. However, the Society's royal charter guaranteed the Fellows an unfettered right to elect to Fellowship whoever they chose and regulation of the number of new members and their scientific qualifications became a pressing concern. In 1823, a committee was established to review the statutes of the Society but it was only in 1827 that the question of membership was considered. James South succeeded in establishing a committee to "consider the best means of limiting the members admitted to the Royal Society, as well as to make such Suggestions on that subject as may seem to them conducive to the Welfare of the Society." However, the committee, chaired by William Hyde Wollaston and comprising South, Davies Gilbert, John Herschel, Thomas Young, Charles Babbage, Francis Beaufort and Henry Kater, had little impact when it reported.[1]

A new crisis was precipitated when Davy resigned as president in July 1827. Gilbert canvassed Sir Robert Peel as a new president. Peel had been an important political intermediary in establishing the Royal Medals, but many were appalled at the prospect of a political, rather than scientific, president. In the face of a deadlock, Davies took the presidency for the remainder of the year but was then succeeded by two non-scientists; first the Duke of Sussex, and then the Marquess of Northampton.[1]

In 1846, the Society established a Charters Committee "with a view to obtaining a supplementary Charter from the Crown", and a particular remit to consider the membership issue. When he was elected to the Council that year, William Robert Grove was co-opted to the committee, his experience in both science and law making him particularly qualified. The committee recommended:[1]

  • Election of Fellows on one day only each year. There had previously been four elections which made the thorough appraisal of candidates difficult;
  • Number of new Fellows limited to fifteen per year; and
  • Thorough consideration of scientific qualifications of candidates.

However, the Society sought the opinion of the Attorney General and Solicitor General who held that it would not be lawful to limit the membership under the current charter. It was Grove who resolved the deadlock by proposing that a limited intake of fifteen be proposed by the council to the Fellows for election, effectively limiting the new membership. Grove facilitated the adoption of the new rules against opposition from the amateurs and from some professionals who regretted any weakening of links with the political establishment. During the 1870s, membership of the Society fell to about 500.[1]

[edit] Current activities and significance

  • Funding scientific research. This is the largest area of expenditure for the Society, costing around £30 m each year. [4] The flagship scheme is the University Research Fellowship which funds early careers scientists, with approximately 300 in post at any time. [5] Other schemes include the Royal Society Research Professorships to be awarded to world leading scientists based in the UK such as Professor Sir Alec Jeffreys FRS and international schemes to encourage foreign collaboration. The majority of grants are paid from the Society's Parliamentary Grant in Aid although some are funded by private donors such as BP and the Wolfson Foundation.
  • Publishing (see later).
  • Providing science advice, including science and mathematics education. High profile reports have recently been produced on nanotechnology and the use of non-human primates in research.
  • Science in Society programme to increase public interest in science. Activities include public lectures, discussion meetings and the annual Summer Science Exhibition (in London and Glasgow).

[edit] Publications

The Royal Society publishes seven, high quality peer-reviewed journals covering: biological and physical sciences; history and philosophy of science; and cross-disciplinary research at the interface between the physical and life sciences. The list includes the world's longest running scientific journal, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.

[edit] Governance

The Society is governed by its Council of Trustees, which is chaired by its President. The members of Council and the President are elected from its Fellowship.

[edit] Fellowship

As with many learned societies, the Society's governance structure is based on its Fellowship. Fellows must be citizens or ordinarily resident of the Commonwealth or Republic of Ireland, otherwise they may be elected as a Foreign Member. Up to 44 new Fellows are elected each year by ballot of the existing Fellows of the Society based on a shortlist drawn up by Council and its 10 Sectional Committees. The Society's statutes state that candidates for election must have made "a substantial contribution to the improvement of natural knowledge, including mathematics, engineering science and medical science".

There are two additional categories: Royal Fellow, for a member of the Royal family to be admitted, and Honorary Fellow, for someone who has "rendered signal service to the cause of science, or whose election would significantly benefit the Society by their great experience in other walks of life". A maximum of forty-four Fellows, six Foreign Members and one Honorary Fellow may be elected each year. [8]

Foreign Member of the Royal Society is an honorary position within the Royal Society. It is a position at the same rank as a Fellow of the Royal Society to which scientists from outside the Commonwealth and the Republic of Ireland may be elected.

Fellows are entitled to use the post-nominal letters FRS. Foreign Members may use the post-nominal letters ForMemRS.

Prior to the creation of the position of Honorary Fellow in 2000, people distinguished in other walks of life would sometimes be elected as Fellows; examples of this are the British Prime Ministers Benjamin Disraeli, Winston Churchill, Clement Attlee, and Margaret Thatcher.

[edit] Council and officers

The Fellowship elects twenty-one members of Council, the governing body and trustees of the society. The chair of the council is the President of the Royal Society, currently Lord Rees of Ludlow. There are four other titled posts, variously referred to as Vice-Presidents, Secretaries and Officers: the Treasurer, the Foreign Secretary, the Physical Secretary and the Biological Secretary. The current holders of these posts are respectively Sir Peter Williams , Professor Lorna Casselton, Professor Martin J. Taylor, and Sir David Read. [9] [10]

[edit] A selected list of Presidents

Mace of the Royal Society, granted by Charles II.
Mace of the Royal Society, granted by Charles II.

[edit] Permanent staff

The Society's 15 Sections are administered by the permanent staff, led by the Executive Secretary, Stephen Cox CVO. The Executive Secretary is supported by the Senior Managers of the Society:

  • Mr Ian Cooper, Director of Finance and Operations
  • Dr Peter Collins, Director of Science Policy
  • Dr Peter Cotgreave, Director of Public Affairs

[edit] Society honours

The Society bestows ten medals, seven awards (prizes) and nine prize lectureships variously annually, biennially or triennially, according to the terms of reference for each award. The Society also runs The Aventis Prizes for Science Books.

Medals and prize lectures are awarded to scientists in honour of the excellence of their science. Only Fellows can make nominations, which are assessed by committees of Fellows which recommends to the Society's Council who should receive them. Nominees need not be Fellows. Medalists and s and Prize Lecturers receive a struck medal, a scroll, and an honorarium from the Society's private funds. Prize lecturers are required to give a public lecture.[2]

The Prizes often have the word Award in their title, and are open to nomination from all. They have a variety of assessment criteria and selection process. Some, such as the Michael Faraday Prize, require the recipient to give a public lecture, whereas others, such as the Kohn Award, provide funds for the recipient to undertake a project.

A full list of recipients is on the Awards section of the Society's website.

[edit] Awards

[edit] Medals

  • Buchanan Medal (for achievements in medicine)
  • Copley Medal (for work in any field of science)
  • Darwin Medal (for work in the broad area of biology in which Charles Darwin worked)
  • Davy Medal (for work in any branch of chemistry)
  • Gabor Medal (for work in biology, especially in genetic engineering and molecular biology)
  • Hughes Medal (for work in the physical sciences, particularly electricity and magnetism)
  • Leverhulme Medal (for work in pure or applied chemistry or engineering)
  • Royal Medal (for the two most important contributions to the advancement of Natural Knowledge)
  • Rumford Medal (for work in the fields of heat or light)
  • Sylvester Medal (for the encouragement of mathematical research)

[edit] Prize lectures

[edit] Selected bibliography

The coat-of-arms of the Royal Society as a stained-glass window. The motto is 'Nullius in verba'.
The coat-of-arms of the Royal Society as a stained-glass window. The motto is 'Nullius in verba'.

[edit] Timeline

  • 1640s — informal meetings
  • November 28, 1660 — Royal Society founded at Gresham College
  • 1661 — name first appears in print, and library presented with its first book
  • 1662 — first Royal Charter gives permission to publish
  • 1663 — second Royal Charter
  • 1665 — first issue of Philosophical Transactions
  • 1666 — Fire of London causes move to Arundel House until 1673, then returns to Gresham College [11]
  • 1669 — third Royal Charter; original proposal would have made Chelsea College the permanent home of the Society, but the site became Chelsea Hospital instead
  • 1710 — acquires its own home in Crane Court
  • 1780 — moves to premises at Somerset House provided by the Crown[12]
  • 1847 — changed election criteria so that future Fellows would be elected solely on the merit of their scientific work
  • 1850 — Parliamentary Grant-in-aid commences, of £1,000, to assist scientists in their research and to buy equipment.
  • 1857 — moved to Burlington House in Piccadilly
  • 1967 — moved to present location on Carlton House Terrace

[edit] See also

[edit] In fiction

The early Royal Society is satirised in Jonathan Swift's 1726 novel Gulliver's Travels when the eponymous protagonist visits the flying island of Laputa.

Professor Henry Higgins is revealed to be a member of the Society in George Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion.

The early days of the Royal Society also form the backdrop for the events of Neal Stephenson's Baroque cycle of novels—Quicksilver, The Confusion, and The System of the World.

The founding members of the Royal Society (such as Robert Boyle) are used as secondary characters in the historical mystery novel An Instance of the Fingerpost, published in 1997 by English writer and art historian Iain Pears. Purposes of the organisation and membership are discussed in parts of the novel, and a days proceedings forms an integral part of the story.

Both Stephen Maturin and Jack Aubrey (main characters in Patrick O'Brian's series of popular novels) are members of the Royal Society.

[edit] Bibliography

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b c d >Crowther, J. G. (1965). Statesmen of Science. London: Cresset Press, 93-97. 
  2. ^ Awards, medals and prize lectures. The Royal Society (2008). Retrieved on 2008-04-02.

[edit] External links

This text was last fetched from this Wikipedia page (where you can edit it) on
14 May 2008, 12:05pm under the terms of the GFDL.

The premises of The Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London (first four properties only).
The premises of The Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London (first four properties only).

Annotations

  • “The Royal Society of London is claimed to be the oldest learned society still in existence. It was founded in 1660.”
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Society

    This is an exciting introduction to a body of some influence in the years to come. Charles II was a supporter and interested party for some time, before eventually losing interest.

  • Early history of the Royal Society:

    The history of science since 1660 is closely intertwined with the story of the Royal Society.

    The origins of the Royal Society lie in an “invisible college” of natural philosophers who began meeting in the mid-1640s to discuss the ideas of Francis Bacon. Its official foundation date is 28 November 1660, when 12 of them met at Gresham College after a lecture by Christopher Wren, the Gresham Professor of Astronomy, and decided to found

  • Robert Hooke

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/discovery/revolutions/hooke_robert_beavon_01.shtml

  • Not to denigrate Robert Hooke and his accomplishments, the Royal Society “was not universally popular and certainly not a fount of wisdom. Much protoscience and pseudoscience and Platonist fantasy was launched or encouraged there. Jonathan Swift’s fictional narrator Lemuel Gulliver chronicled in Gulliver’s Travels a visit to the land of Laputa (= Sp. “the whore”), which is widely known to be a satire of the Royal Society’s early attempts at ‘empirical’ science.

    “Isaac Newton is reputed to have refused to present the elliptical orbit to the Royal Society, simply because he considered them to be idiots who would waste his valuable time. It was only Edmund Halley who managed to convince him to publish, by offering to intercede and justify his results.”http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Royal_Society_of_London_for_the_Improvement_of_Natural_Knowledge

    “Laputa is a flying island or rock, that can be directed by its inhabitants in any direction. Its tyrannic ruler uses it to control the mainland by threatening with covering rebel regions with the island’s shadow. The people of Laputa are fond of mathematics and technology, but fail to make practical use of their knowledge. They insert technologies and abstractions into their conversations inappropriately, such as using large sacks of objects to show each other, which they consider “purer” than words. These sacks weigh them down and bend them over with their weight (any resemblance to the Graphic User Interface is purely anticipatory rather than coincidental).

    “They created such marvels as a mirror that would let you converse with any historical figure, but couldn’t construct well-designed clothing. This is a satire on the Royal Society of his day.

    “The satire of the Royal Society is made even more obvious when Gulliver descends to the mainland of Laputa’s kingdom and visits its capital, Lagado, where there is a “Grand Academy of Projectors”. Among the projects in course in the Academy are:

    -A project to extract sunrays from cucumbers and store them in glass bottles, to release them in winter days.
    -A project to convert human excrement into food.
    -A project to teach blind people to paint, by making them tell one color from another by the taste of the pigments.
    -A project to make silk from spider’s webs.
    -A machine to generate automatically phrases and sentences which, combined together, would form books:….

    “At least some of these projects were inspired by an actual visit that Jonathan Swift made to the Royal Society in 1710.”
    http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Laputa

  • A wonderful link here, about some musical experiments conducted by the Royal Society. I shall also post this in the ‘music’ section, as our man Pepys is mentioned in that context in this link. I’ll also paste the article in case the link disappears.

    http://theowljournal.com/article.php?issue=7&number=1&type=print&comments=1

    Mr Birchensha’s Ear
    by Benjamin Wardhaugh

    It is the afternoon of Wednesday, 10th August, 1664. We

  • HEALING THE NATION’S WOUNDS: ROYAL RITUAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY IN RESTORATION ENGLAND
    Simon Werrett
    Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftgeschichte, Berlin
    Hist. Sci., xxxviii (2000)

    ***
    [from the Introduction]

    “This paper sets out to close the distance between Whitehall and the Royal Society in Restoration London. Re-examining relations between Charles II and his ‘fools’, I argue that the power of the King in 1660s England was key to the legitimation of experimental science….I argue that when Charles was powerful at the Restoration, courtly procedures provided resources for structuring and legitimating experimental practices at the nascent Royal Society. But when Charles became weaker in the following decade, the situation was reversed. Now the King used experimental practices to legitimate his own fragile rule. Thus a process of reciprocal legitimation may be identified between prince and academy, but one whose directionality depended on changing circumstances.
    “My point of entry into this economy in Restoration England is an examination of royal ritual. From being a leading focus in the history of the arts, the study of courtly spectacle has turned out to be a fruitful endeavour for understanding the [279] sciences….Such rituals have not been considered conspicuous in the English court and their relations to natural philosophy have been largely overlooked. So I begin by examining two of the principal forms of royal ritual in Restoration England, the ceremony of the Royal Touch and the Public Execution. I suggest that at the beginning of the 1660s, royal rituals such as these provided valuable resources both for re-establishing the power of the monarchy and for modelling experimental practice. I then explore the implications of the Test Act of 1673 for the ritual of the Royal Touch. As a form of Catholic transubstantiation, the Royal Touch became a controversial practice in light of the Test Act. Yet at just this time, Charles appropriated a series of experiments being undertaken at the Royal Society on a new ‘Stiptique liquor’ recently sent from France. The use of the liquor helped Charles secure his authority, simultaneously assisting in the legitimation of experimental philosophy, which was facing its own criticisms from diverse groups at this time. In the case examined here at least, Whitehall and Gresham College converged on the epistemological map of London, because the King was weak.” http://www.shpltd.co.uk/werrett.pdf


  • Dr. John Wallis:
    The Origin of The Royal Society, 1645-1662

    http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1662royalsociety.html

The premises of The Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London (first four properties only).
The premises of The Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London (first four properties only).

Post an annotation

Before posting an annotation please read the annotation guidelines.
If your comment isn't directly relevant to this page, try the discussion group for other Pepys-related topics or the social group for general chat.

(required)

(required)

(optional)


No HTML in annotations. URLs will be turned into links. About copyright

References in the diary

1662
Apr: 28
1663
May: 20
1665
Jan: 9
Feb: 15
The premises of The Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London (first four properties only).
The premises of The Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London (first four properties only).