Skip navigation

Monday 22 April 1661

KING’S GOING FROM YE TOWER TO WHITE HALL.1

Up early and made myself as fine as I could, and put on my velvet coat, the first day that I put it on, though made half a year ago. And being ready, Sir W. Batten, my Lady, and his two daughters and his son and wife, and Sir W. Pen and his son and I, went to Mr. Young’s, the flag-maker, in Corne-hill;2 and there we had a good room to ourselves, with wine and good cake, and saw the show very well. In which it is impossible to relate the glory of this day, expressed in the clothes of them that rid, and their horses and horses clothes, among others, my Lord Sandwich’s. Embroidery and diamonds were ordinary among them. The Knights of the Bath was a brave sight of itself; and their Esquires, among which Mr. Armiger was an Esquire to one of the Knights. Remarquable were the two men that represent the two Dukes of Normandy and Aquitane. The Bishops come next after Barons, which is the higher place; which makes me think that the next Parliament they will be called to the House of Lords. My Lord Monk rode bare after the King, and led in his hand a spare horse, as being Master of the Horse. The King, in a most rich embroidered suit and cloak, looked most noble. Wadlow, the vintner, at the Devil; in Fleetstreet, did lead a fine company of soldiers, all young comely men, in white doublets. There followed the Vice-Chamberlain, Sir G. Carteret, a company of men all like Turks; but I know not yet what they are for. The streets all gravelled, and the houses hung with carpets before them, made brave show, and the ladies out of the windows, one of which over against us I took much notice of, and spoke of her, which made good sport among us. So glorious was the show with gold and silver, that we were not able to look at it, our eyes at last being so much overcome with it. Both the King and the Duke of York took notice of us, as he saw us at the window. The show being ended, Mr. Young did give us a dinner, at which we were very merry, and pleased above imagination at what we have seen. Sir W. Batten going home, he and I called and drunk some mum and laid our wager about my Lady Faulconbridge’s name, which he says not to be Mary, and so I won above 20s. So home, where Will and the boy staid and saw the show upon Towre Hill, and Jane at T. Pepys’s, the Turner, and my wife at Charles Glassecocke’s, in Fleet Street. In the evening by water to White Hall to my Lord’s, and there I spoke with my Lord. He talked with me about his suit, which was made in France, and cost him 200l., and very rich it is with embroidery. I lay with Mr. Shepley, and [continued tomorrow. P.G.]

  1. The king in the early morning of the 22nd went from Whitehall to the Tower by water, so that he might proceed from thence through the City to Westminster Abbey, there to be crowned.
  2. The members of the Navy Office appear to have chosen Mr. Young’s house on account of its nearness to the second triumphal arch, situated near the Royal Exchange, which was dedicated to the Navy.

Tuesday 23 April 1661Sunday 21 April 1661

8°C / 46°F
(monthly average for April 1661) About

Parliament on this day

There are no journals available for this date.

Annotations

  • “The Bishops came next…..;which makes me think….they will be called to the House of Lords” SP doesn’t say if that is good or bad but one gets the feeling he doesn’t care much about the Bishops.

  • “…one gets the feeling he doesn

  • Here is the counter point: John Evelyn’s account and all the king’s men da da
    http://astext.com/history/ed_1661.html#1661

  • Another view point, from down Essex way
    22. 23. “dry. to serve the pompous show, and coronation at London. on which day….”
    http://linux02.lib.cam.ac.uk/earlscolne/diary/70013040.htm

  • Smart lad, is our Sam, did not have to pay an extra fee to have it made on time.”…and put on my velvet coat, the first day that I put it on, though made half a year ago…”

    And here he is again “…I lay with Mr. Shepley, and …” to lay meaning ones ‘ead on the pillow only, why assume anything else?

  • “one of which over against us I took much notice of”
    An extraordinary day, and an extraordinary entry. We start with the marvelously deft word brush strokes:

    * “Embroidery and diamonds were ordinary among them”
    * “The streets all gravelled”
    * “our eyes at last being so much overcome”
    * “the King and the Duke of York took notice of us”

    and then from the grand to the personal:

    “the ladies out of the windows, one of which over against us I took much notice of”

    Under 500 words, and *you are there*: description, pathos, action, and personality.

    Bravo, Sam.

  • But how was the weather? Yesterday it was an issue, and today.. no mention.

  • How was the weather?
    Thanks to Vicente’s link, we know from Rev. Josselin that it was “dry, to serve the pompous show … at London.”

  • The spectacle and scene described so well in so few words. A picture painted - as DA Smith suggests.

  • … a company of men all like turkes..

    L&M comment that these appear to have been members of the company of the royal footguard, but offer no explanation for their costume. Just possibly by ‘turkes’ Pepys is simply indicating exotic Eastern (or Moorish?) costume, with this company representing a reference to Algiers.

  • Which he said not to be Mary…
    Mary was the daughter of Oliver Cromwell, second wife of Thomas, second Viscount Falconberg, afterwards Earl of Falconberg.

  • No mention of Elizabeth in the company!
    Did Sam leave her with his parents? Possibly his stature is not yet high enough to take his own Lady to ceremonies like this.

  • Reading John Evelyn’s account after having just read Sam’s makes one admire Sam more and more. Evelyn’s account, even given such a wonderful topic is just plain boring - mainly tedious lists! As David Smith says, Sam brings us right there in 500 words. Magic stuff.

  • Cry God,Charles,Sam,England and St.George.

    What a great coincidence that we should read such a marvellous entry on this Day of St. George.

  • It’s not a coincidence!!!

    Obviously the king’s advisers arranged for him to be formally crowned on England’s saint’s day. (News management is a very old profession!)

  • Of course this is the 22nd not the 23rd but I imagine the ceremony is planned to last several days.

  • The weather in the streets.

    Although it is possible that Josselin was enjoying weather different from that in London, I’m sure that Pepys would have passed some comment upon it if it had been wet for the royal parade. Apart from anything else, he would have regretted the danger from rainspotting to his newly-donned velvet coat. All the signs are that Sam the Tailor’s Son takes good care of his clothes

  • Although this is from a smaller, much less important procession it does give us some idea of what the streets might have looked at. Scroll down and click on the pictures at the very bottom of the page to enlarge them:

    http://www.shakespeares-sonnets.com/cheapsd.htm

  • Also Cry Shakespeare!

    I should have added Shakespeare as the 23rd April was also the date of his death.

  • “and the ladies out of the windows… . So glorious was the show with gold and silver, that we were not able to look at it”

    L&M note that the ‘at’ was actually written as “up” in the diary. I don’t think Sam’s mind had quite left the ladies yet. :-)

  • A couple of small diffs. in L&M

    The. Turner was probably not there at cousin Tom’s with Jane Birch; L&M read “T. Pepys the turner”, a description we’ve often seen in the past.

    And here’s a nice turn of phrase that got streamlined out of Wheatley: “saw the Shew very well—in which it is impossible to relate the glory of *that* this day”. I like the way the extra pronoun stretches out the sentence, giving a sense of Sam sitting back to bask in the day’s experiences. With so many glories to think back on, what could be better than taking a little extra time to enjoy?

  • The King’s Going from the Tower

    This is a very special occasion indeed—not only is this procession especially opulent because of the Restoration, but it’s also the last appearance of a dying custom. L&M note that in Charles I’s time the procession was cancelled on account of the plague, and after today the event will never be held again.

  • They mean, I take it, a day-long procession from the Tower to Westminster Abbey held on the day before the coronation.

  • “…and their horses and horses clothes,”
    If you’ve ever ridden gussied-up horses, you know they’re as vain as Sam in his velvet coat. Horses in a Cavalier parade- even this Roundhead looks back and doesn’t scoff.

  • Glyn’s posting of drawings of houses of this era are fascinating. Am I correct in that it looks as if the ground level has no windows but that the higher levels are full of windows? I assume windows meant less use of candles and better light during the day for tasks.

    Did they really have that much glass for windows at that time? Wasn’t it very expensive, or was that just in the “colonies” in America then? ALso, wouldn’t these windows have resulted in chilly rooms in rainy, damp London?

    Any ideas of how Pepys’ home would have looked in 1661?

  • Where Elizabeth was:

    “So home, where Will and the boy staid and saw the show upon Towre Hill, and Jane at T. Pepys

  • JBailey: “ground level has no windows”

    I think what looks like the bottom floor are actually barriers set up for the procession—you’ll notice that they not only have no windows, but no doors, and appear to be continuous until a gap in the third picture along. The actual ground floors would be behind them, and like the upper floors smaller than the floor above them.

  • Glyn: Fantabulous: note the protection from the elements{ or was it from the stink of horses}? for If were modern, one would say plastic sheeting: The detail is wonderful. So many little stories to be seen. Thanks

  • to see the history of English window glass see:
    http://www.londoncrownglass.co.uk/History.html
    In the 17 century glass was a very expensive luxury.
    I presume the windows were closed, when necesary, with wood doors. This is probably the reason that upper floors were bigger, so the lower floors were protected from the rain.

  • Krzysztof:
    your exceptional annotation opens new options to understand those “Turks” marching through London. The scene becomes almost tridimensional with your contribution.
    As for Jan Pasek, I understand he wrote “memoires” in his old age, while Samuel Pepys wrote a diary.
    There is no way to compare the spontaineity of every day events with recolections influenced by the time passed and the knowing of events that happened after what is being written.
    Still as most of us do not read Polish, it is my hope you will compare both writers and annotate whatever you find fit for the enrichment of the site.
    Jeszcze Polska!

  • Ruben:
    You are right, Pasek was more

  • “upper floors were bigger”

    Re - Ruben

    Protection from the rain would not have been the main reason for protruding upper floors - increasing the available floor space to the maximum was the issue here. The size of the plot on which the house was constructed could of course not be made any bigger than it was, but gaining a few feet of space on each one of the subsequent upper storeys was what you went for when building the house. It did occasionally make the front of the house structurally unstable - and some have been known to collapse even before they were finished…

  • Thank you Krzysztof for the wonderful pictures - I think such costumes would have seem “Turkish” to Sam.

  • Krzysztof:
    Thank you for the links. They are very interesting, but I could find only a few sentences by Pasek. Still, from SP’s point of view they are exactly what we looked for. He wrote:
    “Foreigners were not generally able to tell the various eastern fashions apart. While a Pole could spot a Hungarian in any crowd, westerners sometimes could not tell the Poles and Hungarians apart from the Turks. The Poles had to wear very conspicuous field signs of straw rope at the battle of Vienna to ensure the Austrian allies would not become confused.”
    Extraordinary!

  • This picture goes well with today’s entry as well (though I am not sure “Restoration” and “Coronation”) are the same occasion… no doubt someone will put me right if not ?

    http://www.kipar.org/resources/resources-images/paintings/1660/procession_61.jpg

  • Sorry, some more information: the picture is called “Procession of Charles II’s Restoration to the Throne”, 1661. Dirk Stoop. The procession as it leaves the Tower of London for Westminster.

    I came across this rather good collection of paintings at http://www.kipar.org , including for instance this one of Charles II on this, his Coronation Day:

    http://www.kipar.org/resources/resources-images/paintings/1660/charlcro.jpg

  • “Procession of Charles II?s Restoration to the Throne”

    Wow, thanks for more great picture links. It’s interesting being able to see all the men in their red finery, and maybe that figure with its back to us in the foreground is one of the ‘Turks’? The mounted figure behind Charles is Albemarle leading the (spare) “Horse of Estate”.

Post an annotation

Before posting an annotation please read the annotation guidelines.
If your comment isn't directly relevant to this page, try the discussion group for other Pepys-related topics or the social group for general chat.

(required)

(required)

(optional)


No HTML in annotations. URLs will be turned into links. About copyright