Skip navigation

Thursday 14 March 1660/61

With Sir W. Batten and Pen to Mr. Coventry’s, and there had a dispute about my claim to the place of Purveyor of Petty-provisions, and at last to my content did conclude to have my hand to all the bills for these provisions and Mr. Turner to purvey them, because I would not have him to lose the place. Then to my Lord’s, and so with Mr. Creed to an alehouse, where he told me a long story of his amours at Portsmouth to one of Mrs. Boat’s daughters, which was very pleasant. Dined with my Lord and Lady, and so with Mr. Creed to the Theatre, and there saw “King and no King,” well acted. Thence with him to the Cock alehouse at Temple Bar, where he did ask my advice about his amours, and I did give him it, which was to enquire into the condition of his competitor, who is a son of Mr. Gauden’s, and that I promised to do for him, and he to make [what] use he can of it to his advantage. Home and to bed.

Friday 15 March 1660/61Wednesday 13 March 1660/61

6°C / 43°F
(monthly average for March 1661) About

Parliament on this day

There are no journals available for this date.

Annotations

  • “A King and No King” (circa 1611) is a Beaumont and Fletcher play, considered one of the masterpieces of their collaboration. Some information on Beaumont: http://search.eb.com/shakespeare/micro/58/62.html

    and Fletcher: http://search.eb.com/shakespeare/micro/211/91.html

    Here’s a quote:
    “It shew’d discretion, the best part of valor.”

    Here’s the complete text of the play: http://www.ex.ac.uk/~pellison/BF/noking/frameset.htm

  • “with Mr. Creed to an alehouse, where he told me a long story of his amours at Portsmouth to one of Mrs. Boat

  • An earlier link gave us more information about Mr Gauden (later Sir Dennis Gauden). His old home is now a school for children with special needs. Link to website with map, v. small aerial view and small picture of the house
    http://www.treloar.org.uk/school/index2.html

  • I wonder what the advice was?
    “…where he did ask my advice about his amours, and I did give him it…”

    one thought from Plautus , Persa, 1-2
    Qui amans egens ingressus est princeps in Amoris vias, superavit aerumis suis aerumnas Herculi.
    Have money , no money [empy purse]is taking on a huge task , my version.

  • .. to have my hand to all the bills ..

    L&M notes that the Clerk to the Acts had performed these duties in former times, but that as the business grew in volume they had been delegated to others. The ‘Admiral’s Instructions’ of 1662 were to give the Clerk power of supervision over the works

  • “he did ask my advice … and I did give him it”

    The way I read it, his advice was simply to find out about the competition, which Sam then courteously offered to do for him. I imagine the puritanical Creed coming to Sam, in love perhaps for the first time, and completely flummoxed by it. He needs someone to start him off at square one (“So she has another suitor? What do you know about him?”), and Sam is an excellent one to boil things down to their practical essentials.

    I also imagine Sam is delighted to have such an intimate window into Creed’s life, and happy to take part in moving things along. Tomalin describes (pp. 168-171) how he will later be in heaven when he’s entrusted with the preparations for Mrs. Jem’s wedding.

  • Discretion and valor….I wonder whether this was already a common Elizabethan saw when Shakespeare put it into Sir JOhn Falstaff

  • “…It shew

  • re: Creed and Sam

    I find it interesting that these rivals have gotten so close lately. More evidence of Sam’s growing self-confidence, perhaps?

  • Creed and Sam

    One possible reason for their recent closeness is that Creed is employing the well-worn political tactic of trying to get yourself into better books with your professional rival by seeking help with a personal and intimate matter. It’s a form of flattery that doesn’t always work, but can be useful.

  • Almost all Elizabethan writers - including Shakespeare - filled out their books with well-known maxims, usually drawn from classical sources. It wasn’t considered unusual. Many insights attributed to Shakespeare were in fact commonplaces that he was expressing anew.

Post an annotation

Before posting an annotation please read the annotation guidelines.
If your comment isn't directly relevant to this page, try the discussion group for other Pepys-related topics or the social group for general chat.

(required)

(required)

(optional)


No HTML in annotations. URLs will be turned into links. About copyright